1. Generics Bulletin
  2. >>Legal & IP

DoJ Copaxone Kickback Suit ‘Flawed’ And An ‘Overreach,’ Teva Says

Teva Has Filed Motion To Dismiss FCA Complaint

 
• By Dean Rudge

Teva was accused by the US Department of Justice of violating anti-kickback law in donating money to charities that was later used to cover patient co-pays for Copaxone. In a rebuke aimed at having the suit dismissed, the Israeli manufacturer labelled the DoJ’s suit as “fatally flawed.”

Washington DC, USA-June 5, 2018: Robert F Kennedy Department of Justice building entrance "The Place of Justice is a Hallowed Place" engraved in stone above the door
'The government...does not allege that any physician was influenced to prescribe Copaxone, or any patient to use it, because of these donations,' Teva argues • Source: Shutterstock

The US Department of Justice’s False Claims Act lawsuit against Teva over alleged illegal kickbacks involving Copaxone (glatiramer acetate) is “an overreach, based on a flawed legal theory,” the Israeli firm has argued in filing to have the case dismissed.

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Generics Bulletin for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Legal & IP

Sandoz Admits To Widescale Infringement In Resolving US Rinvoq Patent Tussle

 
• By Dean Rudge

Sandoz has reached an agreement with AbbVie to dismiss without prejudice patent-infringement litigation involving more than 20 patents shielding the originator’s blockbuster JAK inhibitor Rinvoq.

Biocon Chooses To Settle Over Eylea In US – Will Others Follow?

 
• By Dave Wallace

After Amgen’s surprise launch of the first US biosimilar to Eylea last year, expectations around competition are being further upended with the news that Biocon Biologics has struck a settlement deal with Regeneron allowing it to launch its own aflibercept rival in the second half of 2026. Will other challengers follow suit?

Sandoz Attacks Amgen Over US Enbrel Exclusivity

 
• By Dave Wallace

Having failed in US patent litigation over Amgen’s Enbrel, Sandoz is taking an alternative approach in trying to get its Erelzi biosimilar to market in the US ahead of patent expiry in 2029: launching an antitrust attack against the originator for “unlawfully extending and entrenching its monopoly."

Jazz Agrees To Fork Out $145m To Resolve Most Xyrem ‘Pay-For-Delay’ Claims

 
• By Dean Rudge

Jazz has agreed a nine figure settlement agreement in the US with purchasers of its Xyrem blockbuster following claims that it illegally delayed generic competition to the blockbuster treatment for narcolepsy via patent-litigation settlement agreements with several ANDA sponsors.

More from Generics Bulletin

Biocon Chooses To Settle Over Eylea In US – Will Others Follow?

 
• By Dave Wallace

After Amgen’s surprise launch of the first US biosimilar to Eylea last year, expectations around competition are being further upended with the news that Biocon Biologics has struck a settlement deal with Regeneron allowing it to launch its own aflibercept rival in the second half of 2026. Will other challengers follow suit?

As US Launches Pharma Probe, AAM Warns Tariffs ‘Will Only Amplify Problems’

 
• By Dave Wallace

News of a fresh US investigation into the pharma sector has sparked renewed concerns over the impact that US trade tariffs would have on the generics and biosimilars industry. The AAM has responded with a warning over the potential effects on shortages and access, while Medicines for Europe has proposed five key action areas to bolster the sector in Europe.

Sandoz Attacks Amgen Over US Enbrel Exclusivity

 
• By Dave Wallace

Having failed in US patent litigation over Amgen’s Enbrel, Sandoz is taking an alternative approach in trying to get its Erelzi biosimilar to market in the US ahead of patent expiry in 2029: launching an antitrust attack against the originator for “unlawfully extending and entrenching its monopoly."