Few cases have captured the attention of the US generics industry like the long-running litigation between Teva and GlaxoSmithKline over “skinny label” US generics that carve out patented indications.
The case – which has potentially huge significance for generic carve-outs more widely – has over the years proceeded through the district and appeals court stages, with GSK ultimately seeing reinstated an early jury finding of infringement and a $235m damages award from 2017, based on Teva’s generic version of Coreg (carvedilol) that carved out a congestive heart failure indication protected by GSK’s reissued US patent RE40,000
Read the full article – start your free trial today!
Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Generics Bulletin for daily insights
- Start your 7-day free trial
- Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
- Access comprehensive global coverage
- Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Already a subscriber?