Supreme Court Appears Dubious Of Gene Patents, But Wary Of Halting Innovation

Justices appeared to favor the government’s position that synthesized genetic material, but not isolated DNA, can be eligible for a patent during oral arguments last week in the case of The Association of Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics Inc.

Justices on the Supreme Court last week seemed inclined to rule that isolated DNA is not patentable, but they may do so in a manner that would provide some protection to biotech inventions.

During oral arguments April 15 in The Association of Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics Inc., justices repeatedly expressed doubt that the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes isolated by Myriad are significantly different from the genes as they exist in the body

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal & IP

State And International Enforcement Agencies May Step Up Amid Uncertain Federal Environment

 
• By 

States and international regulatory bodies may increase their US enforcement role following federal staff cuts, Hyman Phelps & McNamara attorneys said in a recent webinar. The attorneys also expect False Claims Act enforcement and public health to remain key areas of focus at the federal level.

FDA And Boston Scientific Face Legal Action Over Spinal Device Safety

 
• By 

A patient, Dena Lawler, is suing Boston Scientific and the US FDA over alleged harm from a spinal stimulator device. Lawler claims inadequate regulatory review allowed dangerous modifications to the device, which then caused her pain and other health issues. She is calling for reconsideration of the device approvals.

California Medtech Firms Resolve Patent Dispute Over Delivery Catheters

 

Route 92 says it has reached a settlement with Q’Apel Medical over patent claims concerning its Tenzing delivery catheters.

US Medtech Tariffs: How Will EU Navigate Unchartered Territory?

 

US President Trump has imposed sweeping tariffs that encompass medtech. These are expected to drive up costs, disrupt supply chains and hinder innovation, likely driving the EU to seek new trade partnerships to mitigate the impact.

More from Policy & Regulation

Consumer Healthtech Investment Totaled $4.5BN In 2024, But Bar Is High Amid Economic Uncertainty

 
• By 

Global investment in consumer healthtech increased by 9% year-over-year in 2024, totaling $4.5bn, with significant interest in mental health solutions, according to Galen Growth. While the first quarter of 2025 saw raised confidence and investments, the Trump administration’s new tariffs and sweeping changes to healthcare have introduced new uncertainties.

FDA And Boston Scientific Face Legal Action Over Spinal Device Safety

 
• By 

A patient, Dena Lawler, is suing Boston Scientific and the US FDA over alleged harm from a spinal stimulator device. Lawler claims inadequate regulatory review allowed dangerous modifications to the device, which then caused her pain and other health issues. She is calling for reconsideration of the device approvals.

California Medtech Firms Resolve Patent Dispute Over Delivery Catheters

 

Route 92 says it has reached a settlement with Q’Apel Medical over patent claims concerning its Tenzing delivery catheters.