Independent Assessment Of CDRH Calls For Staff Training, Review Process Improvements

The priority recommendations from Booz Allen Hamilton, the independent contractor selected to assess CDRH’s review process for device submissions, include improving staff training on information technology systems and adopting a holistic, multipronged approach to standardize reviews.

An independent assessment contracted by CDRH says the center needs to improve the consistency of its device review process and strengthen its training programs.

CDRH published the priority recommendations from Booz Allen Hamilton assessing the device center’s review process for device submissions....

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Regulation

UK Healthtech Center Of Excellence Given Key MHRA Digital Regulation Role

 
• By 

Ahead of the 11 June UK spending review and its anticipated funding uplift for healthcare and life sciences, the MHRA announced an expansion of its digital expertise by creating a dedicated hub in Leeds, a renowned center of medtech excellence.

Where Do Questions Surrounding The EU’s AI Act Leave The Medtech Industry?

 

The EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act, which entered into force on 1 August 2024, is already facing turbulence.

Medtech Giants Brace for Tariffs Impact: Responses Range From Financial To Philosophical

 

Manufacturing shifts, financial planning, and supply chain changes are among the adjustments that medtech leaders are making to Trump-era tariffs. Medtech Insight’s review of first-quarter earnings calls reveals how firms are navigating the impact and uncertainty of evolving trade policies.

Final Curtain For LDTs? FDA Will Not Appeal District Court Decision To Vacate Final Rule

 

The US FDA has given up on its effort to regulate lab-developed tests as medical devices, at least for now. The agency will not appeal a decision from the Eastern District of Texas that tossed out the FDA’s final rule, leaving the agency with few cards.

More from Policy & Regulation