FDA may have had legitimate concerns that confidential commercial information on a GE Healthcare 510(k) submission were released in 2010 by CDRH scientists, but the agency’s computer monitoring strategy lacked sufficient controls, and may have gone beyond legal bounds, suggests the HHS Office of Inspector General. The agency issued a new interim monitoring policy last September that addresses OIG’s recommendations.
FDA went too far in the computer surveillance of five device center scientists beginning in 2010, according to a report from the HHS Office of Inspector General.
The OIG report details the roles of CDRH and FDA managers in setting up computer surveillance of select staffers believed to have disclosed proprietary device company information to the media. The report, released Feb