Claims And Counterclaims Abound In Highly Competitive Breast Cancer Genomics Market

Companies active in the breast cancer genomics market are waging a war of words and data to push their respective tests forward. With an expanding volume of data showing that genomic testing can save many patients from unnecessary chemotherapy treatment, and positive recommendations issued in major clinical practice guidelines, there is a compelling argument – from both a quality of care and overall economic standpoint – for physicians to use these tests, and strong growth is anticipated in this space going forward.

At the 2013 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS), held this past December, researchers presented the results of several new studies further demonstrating the benefits of genomic testing in breast cancer patients. The tests are performed directly on tumor tissue following excision and assess the expression of various genetic markers in the tumor that have been associated with more aggressive disease. The assays then apply an algorithm that statistically estimates the patient’s risk of cancer recurrence over a period of time. The aim is to help physicians and patients determine, on an individual basis, if chemotherapy is likely to be a good therapeutic choice.

Such tests are rapidly catching on as the standard of care in the breast cancer treatment arena, and there is...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Archive

Final Chance To Have Your Say: Take Our Reader Survey This Week

 
• By 

Editor’s note: This is your final call to participate in the survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. The deadline is 20 September.

Shape Our Content: Take The Reader Survey

 
• By 

Editor’s note: We are conducting a survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. If there are any changes you’d like to see in coverage topics, content format or the method in which you receive and access Medtech Insight, or if you love it how it is, now is the time to have your voice heard.

Patients With Movement Disorders Will Benefit From Medtronic’s Expanded MRI Labeling For DBS

 
• By 

Medtronic announced it received expanded MRI labeling for its DBS systems, which is critical, given that almost 70% of all DBS-eligible patients will likely need an MRI at some point in their care, says Ashwini Sharan, CMO for Medtronic Neuromodulation.

Podcast: Lung Life AI CEO Shares Regulatory And Reimbursement Journey For Lung Cancer Diagnostic

 

In this episode, Medtech Insight reporter Natasha Barrow speaks to LungLife AI CEO Paul Pagano. Lung Life AI is a US-based AIM-listed medical technology company that has developed a liquid biopsy test for the early detection of lung cancer called Lung LB. Pagano runs through the highlights of Lung Life AI journey to date and its future ambition for a strategic partnership. He also provides advice to similar diagnostic companies seeking reimbursement andcompliance with the US FDA Lab Developed Test ruling.

More from Medtech Insight

Medtronic, Philips Cement New Pact To Embed Next-Gen Tech In Monitoring Platforms

 
• By 

Under the terms of the new agreement, Philips will also begin bundling essential supplies – including ECG, noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) components, and batteries – with its Medtronic-enabled monitors.

Bivacor Rotary Heart Could Upend The Artificial Heart Market, If It Reaches Its Destination

 
• By 

Bivacor aims to be first to the US market with a permanent total artificial heart, starting with use as a bridge to transplant. CMO William Cohn says data from countries with low transplant rates could support pivotal trials and long-term use.

Study: FDA’s Breakthrough Path Speeds Access, But Raises Safety Questions

 
• By 

Research recently published in JAMA Internal Medicine found that the FDA met its review timeline goals for the majority of breakthrough devices – but also revealed some apparent shortcomings in safety data supporting the submissions.