1. Medtech Insight
  2. >>Policy & Regulation
  3. >>Legal & IP

Acclarent Execs Move To Appeal Off-Label Conviction

 
• By Elizabeth Orr

Attorneys for former Acclarent executives William Facteau and Patrick Fabian have filed a request that their convictions on off-label marketing charges either be set aside or that they be granted a new trial, citing other recent off-label trials and misconduct by the government.

Two former Acclarent Inc. executives said their recent false-claims convictions violated their First Amendment rights.

A Boston federal jury convicted former Acclarent CEO William Facteau and former VP of sales Patrick Fabian on 10 misdemeanor counts of distribution of adulterated or misbranded medical devices in...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Legal & IP

Final Curtain For LDTs? FDA Will Not Appeal District Court Decision To Vacate Final Rule

 
• By Brian Bossetta

The US FDA has given up on its effort to regulate lab-developed tests as medical devices, at least for now. The agency will not appeal a decision from the Eastern District of Texas that tossed out the FDA’s final rule, leaving the agency with few cards.

State And International Enforcement Agencies May Step Up Amid Uncertain Federal Environment

 
• By Elizabeth Orr

States and international regulatory bodies may increase their US enforcement role following federal staff cuts, Hyman Phelps & McNamara attorneys said in a recent webinar. The attorneys also expect False Claims Act enforcement and public health to remain key areas of focus at the federal level.

FDA And Boston Scientific Face Legal Action Over Spinal Device Safety

 
• By Elizabeth Orr

A patient, Dena Lawler, is suing Boston Scientific and the US FDA over alleged harm from a spinal stimulator device. Lawler claims inadequate regulatory review allowed dangerous modifications to the device, which then caused her pain and other health issues. She is calling for reconsideration of the device approvals.

California Medtech Firms Resolve Patent Dispute Over Delivery Catheters

 
• By Brian Bossetta

Route 92 says it has reached a settlement with Q’Apel Medical over patent claims concerning its Tenzing delivery catheters.

More from Policy & Regulation

FDA Rebukes Four Companies, Including One Overseas, For Procedural Failures

 
• By Brian Bossetta

The US FDA’s device center sent warning letters to three domestic device manufacturers and one German firm for failing to adhere to protocol on several issues.

EU Finalizes Framework For Joint Clinical Assessments Of High-Risk Devices

 
• By Amanda Maxwell

Second submission window for joint scientific consultations on a procedure to help prepare for joint clinical assessments will open from 2 to 30 June 2025.

Get Ready For International Harmonization Before Approaching QMSR Deadline, Says Regulatory Expert

 
• By Brian Bossetta

During MD&M East last week, regulatory consultant Darren Reeves reminded device manufacturers that the time to get ready to comply with the new Quality Management System Regulation is now.