Trump Budget: FDA-Regulated Firms Should Pay 'Their Share' In User Fees

President Trump's initial budget plan for US FDA would, it appears, make industry-paid user fees a much larger proportion of the agency's budget, but details are lacking. As is, the plan could complicate agreements that came out of FDA-industry user-fee negotiations last summer, but observers say this is just the first step in a process and Congress will ultimately decide. Trump would also shave 22% from the National Institutes of Health.

MT1610_StackedCoinsFEES_1200x675

A budget "blueprint" from the Trump administration asks for a major increase in user fees collected from medical-product companies in FY 2018 compared to what firms have agreed to. Meanwhile, the proposal appears to seek a significant reduction in funds provided by Congress to the agency for pre-market reviews, but details are lacking.

As is, the proposal could be a source of complication as the industry pushes for speedy reauthorization of the device user-fee program based on an agreement inked with the Obama administration’s FDA last summer

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legislation

Health Secretary Defends Spending Cuts During Senate Hearing On HHS Budget

 
• By 

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. emphasized administrative cost reductions and defended budget decisions during a Senate hearing on HHS funding. Some senators, however, expressed concerns over the impacts spending cuts had on essential health programs.

Tariffs Threaten Medtech Innovation And US Position As World Leader, Whitaker Tells Lawmakers

 

During his testimony before US senators on the impact of tariffs on critical supply chains, AdvaMed’s Scott Whitaker said the Trump tariffs could jeopardize America’s preeminence in medtech. Other industry experts echoed similar concerns.

‘The FDA Will Be Looking For Avenues To Regulate Laboratory Developed Tests’

 

The FDA's final LDT ruling was struck down in federal court last month. For now, diagnostic companies can commercialize under CLIA regulations or apply for FDA approval. McDermott and Tribun Health have shared insights on the risks, pros and cons of both regulatory routes.

Keep An Eye On Landmark Global Pandemic Treaty, Experts Advise

 

Mechanisms in the draft treaty that the more than 190 member states of the World Health Organization have finally agreed to are expected to “materially affect companies,” particularly those that develop, manufacture or distribute pandemic-related health care products.

More from Policy & Regulation

‘Help Us Deregulate’: RFK Announces RFI For Trimming Government Health Agencies

 

HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is asking the public to help cut waste across the government’s health agencies. Kennedy announced a 60-day comment period allowing the public to take part in a broader federal initiative to reduce regulations and increase transparency.

MedTech Europe’s Bisazza Urges Action As US Tariffs Jeopardize Critical Global Supply Chains

 

The intricate assembly of medical devices, often involving over 1,000 globally sourced components, faces severe disruption due to new US tariffs. These barriers could halt production and devastate small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), MedTech Europe’s CEO, Oliver Bisazza, warns in an interview with Medtech Insight.

UK Medtech Regulators Must Ensure Certainty So Businesses Can Plan Their Futures

 
• By 

With medtech businesses typically managing investment cycles on a three- to five-year basis, local regulatory processes and forward costs of market entry must offer an attractive environment in which companies can plan for growth, says McDermott Will and Emery’s partner and head of healthcare and life sciences, Sharon Lamb. Broad-scale improvements to NICE’s evaluation offerings would similarly enhance the UK’s value to innovators.