5 Figures On 510(k) Exemptions: What's The Impact Of US FDA's Recent Actions?

The 21st Century Cures act requires FDA to identify devices to exempt from 510(k) review, a mandate the agency fulfilled earlier this year. But what will be the tangible impact of the hundreds of new device codes removed from 510(k) requirements? This graphical analysis, conducted in collaboration with regulatory intelligence specialist Graematter, shows the effect may not be as large as the top-line numbers suggest. But select specialties and companies may see a few meaningful burdens lifted.

510(k)s exempted codes

US FDA's recent congressionally directed actions to exempt reams of devices from 510(k) requirements may have less of an impact on industry and agency workloads than the top-line numbers suggest, according to an analysis performed by Medtech Insight in collaboration with regulatory intelligence firm Graematter Inc. But there are pockets of companies and clinical specialties where the effects might be more pronounced, the analysis found.

In July, FDA issued a Federal Register notice listing several hundred class II devices that it was exempting...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Regulation

FDA Panel Supports Dermal Fillers For Décolletage Use

 
• By 

An FDA panel has endorsed the use of dermal fillers for décolletage, but warned of patient safety concerns. The filler can cause complications with future imaging and pregnancy or breastfeeding, panelists said. Regulatory measures and patient studies are recommended for better outcomes.

FDA Changes Fail To Diminish US Appeal To European Medtech Industry

 

Despite staffing cuts and uncertainty at the FDA, the US still offers EU medtech firms stronger regulatory support, regulatory expert Bassil Akra told Medtech Insight. This is especially valued as EU rules are often viewed as overly stringent, unclear and difficult to follow.

Environmental Group Questions FDA’s Stance On PFAS In Medical Devices

 

The US FDA says PFAS used in medical devices are safe and that there’s no reason to restrict them in device production. An environmental group finds the agency’s assertion questionable.

EU4Health Boost For Orphan Devices And SMEs

 
• By 

EU4Health, the main funding instrument for EU health initiatives, has put renewed emphasis on orphan devices in its 2025 work program, published in July.

More from Policy & Regulation

Cardiology And PTA Procedures In Germany’s Expanded Hybrid DRGs List 2026

 
• By 

2026 reimbursement calculations for the list of hybrid DRGs – a mechanism to incentivize day cases over inpatient surgery – will be issued in few weeks’ time. The medtech industry has made its demands known.

Biden-Era Device Trial Snapshot Pilot Halted Amid DEI Policy Shift

 
• By 

The FDA's Device Clinical Trial Snapshot Pilot, aimed at increasing trial transparency and diversity, has been canceled following President Trump’s anti-DEI executive order. Critics warn this may hinder trial transparency, impacting public health and demographic data accessibility.

Warning Letters - July 2025

The US FDA posted three warning letters in July, covering medical supply kits, wearables and orthopedics.