1. Medtech Insight
  2. >>Policy & Regulation
  3. >>Legal & IP

Mixed Final Ruling In Nevro, Boston Sci Patent Spat

 
• By Elizabeth Orr

A California federal judge delivered a mixed verdict in a patent dispute between Nevro Corp. and Boston Scientific. The court said that some of Nevro's claims were patent-eligible, but further ruled that Boston Scientific had not infringed those patents.

Gavel_1200x675

A California court has delivered a mixed verdict in a patent dispute between Nevro Corp. and Boston Scientific Corp., upholding some of Nevro’s key patent claims even while ruling that Boston Scientific hadn’t infringed the patents in question.

Nevro’s patents cover technology used in nerve-stimulation devices for pain that the company says delivers a therapeutic effect without causing...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Legal & IP

Final Curtain For LDTs? FDA Will Not Appeal District Court Decision To Vacate Final Rule

 
• By Brian Bossetta

The US FDA has given up on its effort to regulate lab-developed tests as medical devices, at least for now. The agency will not appeal a decision from the Eastern District of Texas that tossed out the FDA’s final rule, leaving the agency with few cards.

State And International Enforcement Agencies May Step Up Amid Uncertain Federal Environment

 
• By Elizabeth Orr

States and international regulatory bodies may increase their US enforcement role following federal staff cuts, Hyman Phelps & McNamara attorneys said in a recent webinar. The attorneys also expect False Claims Act enforcement and public health to remain key areas of focus at the federal level.

FDA And Boston Scientific Face Legal Action Over Spinal Device Safety

 
• By Elizabeth Orr

A patient, Dena Lawler, is suing Boston Scientific and the US FDA over alleged harm from a spinal stimulator device. Lawler claims inadequate regulatory review allowed dangerous modifications to the device, which then caused her pain and other health issues. She is calling for reconsideration of the device approvals.

California Medtech Firms Resolve Patent Dispute Over Delivery Catheters

 
• By Brian Bossetta

Route 92 says it has reached a settlement with Q’Apel Medical over patent claims concerning its Tenzing delivery catheters.

More from Policy & Regulation

Global Medtech Guidance Tracker: May 2025

 
• By Vibha Sharma

Stay current on regulatory guidelines from around the world with Medtech Insight's Guidance Tracker. Thirty-six documents have been posted on the tracker since its last update.

More Haste Less Pace? Challenging The ‘Early As Possible’ Principle In Medtech Innovation

 
• By Stuart Grant

The rallying cry to start as early as possible has become increasingly common in the world of medical device development. Innovation expert Dr. Stuart Grant challenges this conventional wisdom, asking: Is "sooner" truly better, or is there a smarter path to market for your medical device?

Guardant’s Multi-Cancer Detection Test Granted FDA Breakthrough Device Designation

 
• By Natasha Barrow

Guardant Health’s methylation-based blood test – Shield MCD – showed a specificity of 98.6% and sensitivity of 75% across eight cancer types in its clinical validation data presented at ASCO.