Trump Signs Bill Bolstering US FDA Device Center Funding By 2% To $8M

The FDA’s device center is getting a 2% boost after President Trump on 20 December signed off on all appropriations bills for fiscal year 2020.

United States Capitol on 50 Dollars bill USA money banknote

The US Food and Drug Administration's Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) will receive an additional $8m, or a 2% boost, in FY2020 funding after President Trump signed a new spending package into law on 20 December. All FDA spending will rise from a total of $3.07bn in FY2019 to $3.16bn in FY2020, an increase of approximately 3%. A key provision of the bill repealed the medical device excise tax that the medical device industry has been fighting against for the past seven years. (Also see "After Seven Years Device Tax Repeal Looks Certain" - Medtech Insight, 17 December, 2019.)

Besides congressional funding, the FDA's device center is expected to raise $219m in medical device user fees, which will bring...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legislation

More from Policy & Regulation

UK Trails NHS 10-Year Plan With Launch Imminent

 
• By 

Healthcare product industries await publication of the NHS 10-Year Plan, due out the coming days, which will focus on health generally not just the NHS, UK health secretary Wes Streeting said during a final prelaunch event on 24 June.

New EU Rules Limit Chinese Participation In Medtech Procurement

 

From June 30, new European Commission rules will attempt to redress an imbalance in medtech trade between the EU and the People’s Republic of China.

Mexico’s New Procurement Rules Aim To Increase Healthcare Investment, But May Face Legal Trouble

 

Legal experts warn, however, that new Mexican procurement rules are discriminatory and could be challenged in the courts.