Should the inventor of a technology be able to argue later that its patent shouldn’t have been issued? The US Supreme Court took up the issue on 21 April in a case that started with a device sector dispute, but could have ramifications for innovators and patent-holders across the economy.
The case, Minerva Surgical v. Hologic Inc., began when the inventor of an endometrial ablation device left Hologic and went to work at Minerva
Read the full article – start your free trial today!
Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights
- Start your 7-day free trial
- Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
- Access comprehensive global coverage
- Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Already a subscriber?