ITC Ruling Hands AliveCor Big Win Against Tech Giant

Apple Watch imports could be barred from US

A judge with the US International Trade Commission sided with AliveCor in its ongoing feud with Apple, finding that the tech giant infringed on AliveCor’s patented electrocardiogram technology. The initial ruling sets up a full ITC review later this year.

APPLE WATCH HEART
• Source: Shutterstoc

In a decision that could exclude Apple Inc.watches from being imported into the US, an administrative law judge with the International Trade Commission (ITC) found the tech giant infringed on the patented technology of AliveCor, a Silicon Valley-based company that makes cardiac monitoring products, such as the AI-enabled KardiaMobile platform that detects atrial fibrillation.

The initial ruling, issued by Judge Cameron Elliot on 27 June, sets up a full review by the ITC, which is expected to hand down a final determination on...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal & IP

Final Curtain For LDTs? FDA Will Not Appeal District Court Decision To Vacate Final Rule

 

The US FDA has given up on its effort to regulate lab-developed tests as medical devices, at least for now. The agency will not appeal a decision from the Eastern District of Texas that tossed out the FDA’s final rule, leaving the agency with few cards.

State And International Enforcement Agencies May Step Up Amid Uncertain Federal Environment

 
• By 

States and international regulatory bodies may increase their US enforcement role following federal staff cuts, Hyman Phelps & McNamara attorneys said in a recent webinar. The attorneys also expect False Claims Act enforcement and public health to remain key areas of focus at the federal level.

FDA And Boston Scientific Face Legal Action Over Spinal Device Safety

 
• By 

A patient, Dena Lawler, is suing Boston Scientific and the US FDA over alleged harm from a spinal stimulator device. Lawler claims inadequate regulatory review allowed dangerous modifications to the device, which then caused her pain and other health issues. She is calling for reconsideration of the device approvals.

California Medtech Firms Resolve Patent Dispute Over Delivery Catheters

 

Route 92 says it has reached a settlement with Q’Apel Medical over patent claims concerning its Tenzing delivery catheters.

More from Policy & Regulation

Abbott Announces FDA Approval Of Tendyne Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement System

 
• By 

Abbott received the US FDA nod for its Tendyne system, offering a minimally invasive alternative to replace the valves of patients with severe mitral valve disease who are at risk for open-heart surgery.

FDA Rebukes Four Companies, Including One Overseas, For Procedural Failures

 

The US FDA’s device center sent warning letters to three domestic device manufacturers and one German firm for failing to adhere to protocol on several issues.

EU Finalizes Framework For Joint Clinical Assessments Of High-Risk Devices

 

Second submission window for joint scientific consultations on a procedure to help prepare for joint clinical assessments will open from 2 to 30 June 2025.