ITC Ruling Hands AliveCor Big Win Against Tech Giant

Apple Watch imports could be barred from US

A judge with the US International Trade Commission sided with AliveCor in its ongoing feud with Apple, finding that the tech giant infringed on AliveCor’s patented electrocardiogram technology. The initial ruling sets up a full ITC review later this year.

APPLE WATCH HEART
• Source: Shutterstoc

In a decision that could exclude Apple Inc.watches from being imported into the US, an administrative law judge with the International Trade Commission (ITC) found the tech giant infringed on the patented technology of AliveCor, a Silicon Valley-based company that makes cardiac monitoring products, such as the AI-enabled KardiaMobile platform that detects atrial fibrillation.

The initial ruling, issued by Judge Cameron Elliot on 27 June, sets up a full review by the ITC,...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal & IP

Innovative Wants Injunction Against J&J Subsidiary After $442M Antitrust Verdict

 
• By 

Innovative Healthcare is asking for a permanent injunction against Johnson & Johnson subsidiary Biosense Webster after winning a $442 million antitrust verdict. The injunction aims to prevent continued anticompetitive practices in the electrophysiology catheter market.

Final Curtain For LDTs? FDA Will Not Appeal District Court Decision To Vacate Final Rule

 

The US FDA has given up on its effort to regulate lab-developed tests as medical devices, at least for now. The agency will not appeal a decision from the Eastern District of Texas that tossed out the FDA’s final rule, leaving the agency with few cards.

State And International Enforcement Agencies May Step Up Amid Uncertain Federal Environment

 
• By 

States and international regulatory bodies may increase their US enforcement role following federal staff cuts, Hyman Phelps & McNamara attorneys said in a recent webinar. The attorneys also expect False Claims Act enforcement and public health to remain key areas of focus at the federal level.

FDA And Boston Scientific Face Legal Action Over Spinal Device Safety

 
• By 

A patient, Dena Lawler, is suing Boston Scientific and the US FDA over alleged harm from a spinal stimulator device. Lawler claims inadequate regulatory review allowed dangerous modifications to the device, which then caused her pain and other health issues. She is calling for reconsideration of the device approvals.

More from Policy & Regulation

US FDA Unveils Plans To Consolidate Support Services

 

Commissioner Martin Makary told staff that plans are being developed to centralize HR, IT, travel and other functions, which were heavily impacted by the 1 April reduction-in-force.

A Year After Exiting The Ventilator Market, Medtronic Recalls Thousands Of Newport Devices

 

After two serious injuries and one death linked to some of its ventilators, Medtronic has recalled the devices and asked customers to stop using them and find alternative means. The action comes more than a year after the company left the market.

MDUFA VI Launches With Public Meeting, Call For Comments

 
• By 

Preparations for the reauthorization of the Medical Device User Fee Amendments for 2028-2032 are underway, with the US FDA announcing a public meeting for 4 August. After negotiations with industry and other stakeholders, a draft agreement is due to Congress by 15 January 2025.