Health Industry Groups Press For Diagnostics Reform Bill

Almost 50 stakeholder groups have signed onto a letter to US Congressional leadership that asks lawmakers to pass the VALID Act, which would update the country’s approach to diagnostic test regulation. Congress needs to pass a user fee package this month to ensure full FDA funding.

US Capitol building, Washington DC (f11photo/Shutterstock.com)

Diagnostics industry companies, patient groups, [BB1]and trade associations are speaking up in the wake of last week’s news that US Food and Drug Administration user fee reauthorization legislation – which Congress must pass soon to maintain agency operations – might not include long-discussed diagnostic regulatory reforms.

The VALID (Verifying Accurate Leading-edge IVCT Development) Act, which would allow the FDA to regulate in vitro diagnostics, including lab-developed tests (LDTs), had been bundled into the Senate’s user fee package and was widely expected to pass. However, some lawmakers are getting cold feet about drug pricing provisions within the Senate’s version of the bill and have pressed to strip the bill back to basics

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legislation

‘The FDA Will Be Looking For Avenues To Regulate Laboratory Developed Tests’

 

The FDA's final LDT ruling was struck down in federal court last month. For now, diagnostic companies can commercialize under CLIA regulations or apply for FDA approval. McDermott and Tribun Health have shared insights on the risks, pros and cons of both regulatory routes.

Keep An Eye On Landmark Global Pandemic Treaty, Experts Advise

 

Mechanisms in the draft treaty that the more than 190 member states of the World Health Organization have finally agreed to are expected to “materially affect companies,” particularly those that develop, manufacture or distribute pandemic-related health care products.

New Semiconductor Tariffs Could Raise Device Costs

 
• By 

Proposed tariffs on semiconductors from President Donald Trump could significantly raise costs for the US medical device industry. Current domestic production cannot meet demand, spurring concerns about potential price increases for consumers and healthcare systems.

AdvaMed Unveils Its First ‘AI Roadmap’ To Help Lawmakers Navigate Regulating The Technology Through Rocky Times

 

Members of AdvaMed’s digital health tech board of directors discussed the organization’s efforts to aid the Trump administration and Congress in answering AI policy questions, especially as companies deal with mounting regulatory uncertainty.

More from Policy & Regulation

UK Medtech Regulators Must Ensure Certainty So Businesses Can Plan Their Futures

 
• By 

With medtech businesses typically managing investment cycles on a three- to five-year basis, local regulatory processes and forward costs of market entry must offer an attractive environment in which companies can plan for growth, says McDermott Will and Emery’s partner and head of healthcare and life sciences, Sharon Lamb. Broad-scale improvements to NICE’s evaluation offerings would similarly enhance the UK’s value to innovators.

First At-Home Cervical Cancer Screening Tool Gets FDA Clearance

 
• By 

The US FDA has approved the Teal Wand, the first at-home cervical cancer screening device. Capable of detecting preclinical cancer with 96% accuracy, it will launch in California in June and expand nationwide soon after.

SS Innovations Files For De Novo For SSi Mantra 3 Surgical Robotic System For Multispecialty Indications

 
• By 

SS Innovations announced plans to file a de novo application with the US FDA for its SSi Mantra 3 surgical robot, already approved for marketing in six countries. The Florida-based firm also plans to pursue the CE mark for European commercialization.