Xarelto Approval For AF Stroke Risk Reduction Tested FDA’s Comparative Efficacy Powers, But Conservative View Prevailed

J&J/Bayer’s Xarelto tested the limits of FDA’s policy on comparative efficacy, thanks to suboptimal use of the active comparator, warfarin, and the introduction of a new competitor, Pradaxa. In the medical reviewers’ view, new therapies should be as effective as existing therapies used skillfully, but division leadership would withhold approval only if the new drug were clearly inferior to approved agents.

The primary reviewers of Johnson & Johnson/Bayer AGXarelto (rivaroxaban) for stroke risk reduction in atrial fibrillation patients argued that the still-recent approval of Boehringer Ingelheim Corp.’s Pradaxa (dabigatran) gave FDA grounds to demand comparative efficacy data to justify rivaroxaban’s approval. But the leadership of FDA’s Division of Cardiovascular and Renal Products cleared Xarelto on the basis of existing data, holding to a more limited view of what triggers the agency’s ability to require that comparative effectiveness be shown to alternative therapy.

Boehringer’s Pradaxa was cleared in October 2010 – months before the Xarelto submission for reducing the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation but well after the clinical study was conducted

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Archive

Ocaliva: Still No Clarity On Why EU Court Opposed Revocation Of Approval

 

Advanz Pharma would have had to show that the European Commission’s decision to revoke Ocaliva’s conditional marketing approval risked causing serious and irreparable harm, according to lawyers from Van Bael & Bellis.

Final Chance To Have Your Say: Take Our Reader Survey This Week

 
• By 

This is your final call to participate in the survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. The deadline is 20 September.

Shape Our Content: Take The Reader Survey

 
• By 

We are conducting a survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. If there are any changes you’d like to see in coverage topics, article format, or the method in which you access the Pink Sheet – or if you love it how it is – now is the time to have your voice heard.

Brazil Pilots Digital Drug Pack Inserts

 

A new pilot aims to take Brazil closer to ‘digital transformation.’

More from Pink Sheet

Darzalex Faspro Gains US FDA AdComm Support For Smoldering Myeloma Claim

 

The use of J&J’s Darzalex Faspro in high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma could result in overtreatment, but the FDA committee voted in favor of the new claim for delay in development of multiple myeloma.

STARGLO Dulled: Genentech’s Columvi Data Not Generalizable To US Patients, FDA Panel Says

 
• By 

The glofitamab trial results are not generalizable due to the small number of enrolled US lymphoma patients and adverse results across multiple endpoints for patients from non-Asian regions, the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee said.

Legal, Process Problems May Plague New US FDA COVID-19 Vaccine Policy

 

The FDA may have violated laws and regulations along with many norms in how it released its planned changes for COVID-19 vaccine approvals.