Biologics Naming: WHO Final Plan, FDA Draft Guidance Incompatible

US regulator could try to harmonize its nonproprietary naming approach with World Health Organization's biological qualifier system or stick with its suffix-based proposal; while having different names across the globe for a single product is not ideal, it's also not an insurmountable problem, experts say.

With the World Health Organization having finalized a voluntary naming convention for biologics, the focus now turns to whether FDA will stick with its own proposed nomenclature approach or adopt the WHO model.

Although there are similarities between WHO's final plan and FDA's naming system, which remains in draft form, there are important...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Drug Safety

More from Pink Sheet

EMA Explores Supporting Drug Development For High Unmet Need Disorder Scleroderma

 

While treatments for scleroderma are in development, none are approved for the condition that is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The European Medicines Agency says guidance on how to design development programs for the disorder is needed.

EMA Nod For First MASH Drug Rezdiffra, Cell Therapy Zemcelpro And 11 Others

 

Madrigal Pharmaceuticals’ Rezdiffra is on track to become the first medicine approved in the EU for non-cirrhotic metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis after the European Medicines Agency recommended that it be granted conditional marketing authorization.

BIO Notebook: Policy Uncertainty Constraining Dealmaking

 

Highlights from Day Four of the BIO International Convention include policy concerns helping constrain dealmaking, Novartis discussing its approach to partnering, and Generate looking for funding to move into Phase III.