BLAs More Appealing As 'Transition' NDAs, ANDAs Set To Lose Exclusivity

Certain protein products approved under FD&C Act before March 23, 2020 would lose their remaining non- orphan exclusivity, and would not qualify for 12-year biologic exclusivity.

Licensure under the BLA pathway, even though it may have more testing requirements, appears to be a more attractive regulatory strategy than the NDA route in the near-term under FDA's interpretation of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act's "transition provisions" for certain protein products.

In a new draft guidance, FDA explains how it will implement the "deemed to be a license" provision in Section 7002(e) of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from United States

US FDA’s June Approval Forecast: Infection Prevention, Cancer And HAE

 

Upcoming FDA user fee goal dates include novel products from a busy lung cancer pipeline, a single-dose passive immunization against RSV for infants, what could be the first oral HAE acute treatment, and a first-in-class HAE preventive antibody.

GLP-1 Pricing ‘Paradigm Shift’ Possible, But Would It Meet Trump’s MFN Goals?

 
• By 

For the Trump Administration, the blockbuster GLP-1 drugs for obesity have become a poster child for the disparity between US and foreign prices.

Pink Sheet Podcast: US FDA’s Private Pharma CEO Tour, HHS Changes COVID-19 Vaccine Advice

Pink Sheet reporter and editors consider the issues that could emerge during upcoming private FDA forums with pharma CEOs, as well as the impact of the surprising move by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to limit the CDC recommendation for annual COVID-19 vaccine boosters.

US FDA’s ‘Good Reputation’ For Science May Mean Loper Bright Not ‘Cataclysmic,’ Attorney Says

 

Bridget Dooling, a law school professor who reviewed draft regulations from the FDA and other agencies as an OMB attorney, said prior federal court decisions suggest judges typically defer to agency decisions based in science.

More from North America

US FDA’s ‘Good Reputation’ For Science May Mean Loper Bright Not ‘Cataclysmic,’ Attorney Says

 

Bridget Dooling, a law school professor who reviewed draft regulations from the FDA and other agencies as an OMB attorney, said prior federal court decisions suggest judges typically defer to agency decisions based in science.

US FDA’s Prasad: ‘We Will Always Embrace Surrogate Endpoints’

 

The new CBER director, once best known in the pharma world for criticizing accelerated approval, committed to expediting cancer drugs with surrogate endpoints.