Undermining the Foundation: High Stakes in Fight Over Reagan-Udall
• By Michael McCaughan
The Reagan-Udall Foundation is the one piece of the FDA drug safety law enacted in 2007 that both FDA and industry are excited about. Congressional appropriators, however, have serious concerns. The stakes are higher than they seem: in the short run, the Critical Path and active surveillance systems may depend on the foundation. In the long run, the question is whether industry has any say in the evolution of regulation.
Michael McCaughan
In the context of an $18 billion dollar spending bill for the Department of Agriculture and related agencies, $500,000 doesn’t...
Read the full article – start your free trial today!
Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights
Advanz Pharma would have had to show that the European Commission’s decision to revoke Ocaliva’s conditional marketing approval risked causing serious and irreparable harm, according to lawyers from Van Bael & Bellis.
We are conducting a survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. If there are any changes you’d like to see in coverage topics, article format, or the method in which you access the Pink Sheet – or if you love it how it is – now is the time to have your voice heard.
A 26 June deadline looms for the final guidance even though a draft guidance was removed from the agency’s website to comply with President Trump’s gender ideology executive order. The concepts underpinning the guidance are still relevant, legal experts say.
Pink Sheet reporter and editors discuss CBER Director Vinay Prasad’s expectation to stay out of routine application decisions, despite the agency’s top-down leadership approach, and the extent of proposed FDA budget cuts.
The EU product information for Novo Nordisk’s semaglutide medicines is to be updated to include non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy as a side effect with a frequency of “very rare.”