Time for Transparency: PDUFA V’s Big “Experiment”

Industry came to the PDUFA V negotiating table with one big agenda item: improved communication with FDA officials about a product under review. They succeeded, but it came with a price: an extra two months for FDA to review an application. While it may seem like things just went back to 2002, both industry and the agency say it could actually lead to faster approvals.

The way to get to faster approval times is to take longer to review an application.

If that sounds like an oxymoron to you, you’re not alone. But that’s precisely what Food & Drug Administration officials and many in industry believe can happen under the fifth...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from United States

More from North America

Non-User Fee Dollars Increased In US FDA’s Updated FY 2026 Budget Request

 

The budget authority total, which is significantly higher than the amount floated in an April OMB draft document, suggests there may have been successful lobbying to increase FDA funding.

US ‘Most Favored Nation’ Pricing Could be Game Changer for Drug Access In Germany

 

In this first in a series of articles looking at the potential impact of the MFN drug pricing policy on European pharmaceutical markets, EUCOPE’s Alexander Natz tells the Pink Sheet why the US policy underscores the importance of confidential net pricing.

Pfizer’s All-Comers CRPC Dream For Talzenna Quashed For Lack Of Biomarker-Negative Rigor

 

The lack of a formal analysis of efficacy in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients without HRR mutations doomed Pfizer’s Talzenna at the US FDA's Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee, as FDA oncology chief Richard Pazdur says chance cannot be ruled out.