Accelerated Approval: US FDA Defends Size Of Premarket Safety Databases, Confirmatory Endpoints

Taking on critics who say it is too quick to award accelerated approval based on surrogate endpoints and limited safety data, agency's 25-year review shows cancer drugs receiving accelerated approval generally have twice the amount of safety data as efficacy, and more than half have confirmed clinical benefit after approval.

Medical book with Stethoscope

Safety databases for new molecular entity oncology and hematology drug indications approved under accelerated approval are, on average, twice the size of the efficacy databases, US FDA staff say in a review article published online in JAMA Oncology March 1.

The review, which takes a data-driven look at the agency's use of the accelerated approval mechanism for cancer treatments over the past 25 years, suggests that accelerated approval indications are supported by ample safety information even

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Approval Standards

More from Pathways & Standards

US FDA Rare Disease Case Studies Provide Development Models For Sponsors

 

Sanofi’s Xenpozyme and Sentynyl’s Nulibry are the first two case studies the FDA is using to continue educating rare disease sponsors on best practices.

Pink Sheet Podcast: A New Director For US FDA’s Biologics Center, Guidance Production Slowdowns

 

Pink Sheet editors discuss the appointment of Vinay Prasad as the new director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research and revelations that FDA layoffs now are hindering development of guidance documents.

US FDA Advisory Committee Misperceptions Abound … At HHS

 

HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. regularly decries the “conflicts of interest” he believes abound in advisory committees, but his concerns, as well as a recent “policy directive” eliminating industry representatives, seem driven by a misunderstanding of the panels’ jobs.