Refining A Controversial Endpoint: Sarepta Banking On Dystrophin Levels For Golodirsen Approval In DMD

While glodirsen did show higher levels of dystrophin production than eteplirsen did, increase is still unlikely to satisfy US FDA reviewers who disagreed with Janet Woodcock's decision to grant accelerated approval to eteplirsen.

Sarepta Therapeutics Inc. is hoping to bring another Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) product through the US FDA by relying on a controversial surrogate endpoint, and question now is what kind of precedent will the company's golodirsen candidate set, as the company announced plans to complete a rolling submission of a new drug application (NDA) by the end of 2018 based on increase in mean dystrophin protein levels.

The March 12 announcement comes as Sarepta said it received the minutes from Type C meeting with FDA's Division of Neurology Products in February, where the agency endorsed a clinical development approach used

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Approval Standards

More from Pathways & Standards

US FDA Vaccine Framework Coming In Weeks, But Details Vague

 

New CBER Director Prasad will "unleash a massive" framework on vaccines, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said 15 May, raising questions about the impact on products nearing approval.

UK’s International Recognition Procedure: EU Dossier Faster Than US Or Canada

 

Companies that use the European Medicines Agency as a reference regulator for the UK’s International Recognition Procedure can expect a faster approval than those that use other national regulators, such as those in the US and Canada, an MHRA spokesperson has said.

HHS Secretary Kennedy Says Trump Will Make Final Decision On Mifepristone Policy

 

With an FDA review ongoing, Kennedy’s admission, made during a Senate hearing on the Health and Human Services Department’s budget request, suggests political officials could supersede scientific decisions.