1. Pink Sheet
  2. >>Legal & IP

Inter Partes Patent Challenges Are Constitutional, US Supreme Court Rules

 
• By Sue Sutter

But Patent Trial and Appeals Board must issue final written decision on all claims raised by challenger – not just some of them, court says; rulings in two closely watched cases mean that IPR proceedings can continue unabated, but generic drug and biosimilar sponsors may need to rethink how they go about challenging innovator patent claims.

Facade of US Supreme court in Washington DC on sunny day

Two US Supreme Court decisions handed down April 24 keep alive the ability of generic drug and biosimilar sponsors to administratively challenge innovator patents but could affect their strategies for initiating such challenges through the Patent Trial and Appeals Board.

In a 7-2 decision in Oil States Energy Services v Greene's Energy Group, the high court ruled that the...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Legal & IP

EU Pharma Reform: Council Proposal A ‘Step In The Right Direction’ But ‘More Work To Be Done’

 
• By Eliza Slawther

Experts from EUCOPE explain why the Council of the EU’s position on the proposed overhaul of the general pharmaceutical legislation could offer more predictability for companies than the commission’s initial offering.

Aurobindo, MSN Fail To Beat US Nuplazid Patent Expiring In August 2038

 
• By Dean Rudge

Acadia’s Nuplazid for hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson’s disease psychosis appears safe from generic competition until well into the next decade, following a favorable infringement and validity decision by a US district court.

How Pharma Companies Can Mitigate The Impact Of US Tariffs On The Supply Chain

 
• By Ewan Townsend

If US tariffs on pharmaceutical supply chain products come into force they could be disruptive for companies. Ewan Townsend, of the international law firm Arnold & Porter, explains how companies can mitigate issues through negotiating with suppliers and reallocating tariff responsibilities.

US FDA’s ‘Good Reputation’ For Science May Mean Loper Bright Not ‘Cataclysmic,’ Attorney Says

 
• By Malcolm Spicer

Bridget Dooling, a law school professor who reviewed draft regulations from the FDA and other agencies as an OMB attorney, said prior federal court decisions suggest judges typically defer to agency decisions based in science.

More from Pink Sheet

Semaglutide: EMA Safety Probe Confirms Rare Eye Disorder Risk

 
• By Neena Brizmohun

The EU product information for Novo Nordisk’s semaglutide medicines is to be updated to include non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy as a side effect with a frequency of “very rare.”

Infographic: Leqembi – A Geographical Comparison

 
• By Anabel Costa-Ferreira

The Pink Sheet explores how regulatory approvals for Leqembi differ around the world, and looks at what is coming next.

EU Pharma Reform: Council Proposal A ‘Step In The Right Direction’ But ‘More Work To Be Done’

 
• By Eliza Slawther

Experts from EUCOPE explain why the Council of the EU’s position on the proposed overhaul of the general pharmaceutical legislation could offer more predictability for companies than the commission’s initial offering.