Product Liability Returning To Supreme Court With Government, Former FDA Officials On Opposite Sides

US government supports Merck, saying FDA labeling decision preempts Fosamax failure-to-warn claim. Joshua Sharfstein and two other former FDAers argue Merck sought warning on a lesser injury.

Supreme Court long shot

In a case that could limit drug product liability litigation, the US Supreme Court is to decide whether FDA rejection of a manufacturer's proposed label warning preempts claims under state law that the manufacturer failed to adequately warn of the product's risks.

The court is to hear oral argument in the case, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Albrecht, Jan. 7. Merck & Co. Inc. is challenging a decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit that revived hundreds of complaints in multidistrict litigation alleging the company did not provide sufficient warning of the risk of femur fractures with use of its osteoporosis drug Fosamax (alendronate). At issue is the interpretation of the Supreme Court's landmark 2009 Wyeth v

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal & IP

HHS Secretary Kennedy Says Trump Will Make Final Decision On Mifepristone Policy

 

With an FDA review ongoing, Kennedy’s admission, made during a Senate hearing on the Health and Human Services Department’s budget request, suggests political officials could supersede scientific decisions.

Medicare Negotiation Does Not Violate Due Process, Appeals Court Rules, Other Suits At Risk

 
• By 

Decision in AstraZeneca’s lawsuit against the Health and Human Services Department is a precedent-setting victory for the government and a blow to manufacturer efforts to block the price negotiation program.

UK Health Data Research Service Looks ‘Encouraging’ For Industry, But Implementation Details Will Be Key

 

Marcus Vass and Vladimir Murovec of international law firm Osborne Clarke tell the Pink Sheet what the government's planned HDRS might mean for industry, and how it compares with the European Health Data Space.

EU Wants Industry To Define ‘Trade Secrets’ Under Health Data Sharing Regulation

 

The European Health Data Space Regulation is deliberately “vague” when it comes to defining trade secrets because the EU wants the pharma industry to make recommendations on safeguarding intellectual property, a policy officer for the European Commission says.

More from Pink Sheet

EU Shaping Biotech Act To Unleash SME Potential

 

European companies, in particular small and midsize enterprises, spin-offs and start-ups have a hard time expanding within the single market “because of a complex regulatory framework that is perceived as slow and burdensome,” according to the European Commission.

New EU Filings

 

Brensocatib, Insmed's investigational treatment for non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, is among the latest products that have been filed for review by the European Medicines Agency for potential EU marketing approval.

‘Tectonic’ Arkansas PBM Legislation May Upend Industry

 
• By 

Industry will fight hard to prevent other states or the federal government from adopting measures similar to Arkansas' law preventing PBMs from owning pharmacies.