Indivior Knew Suboxone Film Did Not Have Greater Child Safety Than Tablet, Grand Jury Claims

Indictment alleges Indivior falsely cited concerns about pediatric exposure to tablets in discontinuing the formulation; FDA official says company tried to mislead agency and bar competition for Suboxone.

Indivior

The US FDA's assessment of the pediatric safety of Suboxone Film was cited in a federal grand jury indictment of Indivior PLC alleging the company fraudulently marketed the sublingual formulation of buprenorphine/naloxone as safer, less divertible and less abusable than other opioid addiction treatments. It also alleges that the company falsely cited concerns about pediatric exposure to the tablet as the reason for discontinuing the formulation and replacing it with the patent protected film product.

The charges are similar to fraudulent marketing claims that have been made against opioid makers

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal & IP

HHS Secretary Kennedy Says Trump Will Make Final Decision On Mifepristone Policy

 

With an FDA review ongoing, Kennedy’s admission, made during a Senate hearing on the Health and Human Services Department’s budget request, suggests political officials could supersede scientific decisions.

Medicare Negotiation Does Not Violate Due Process, Appeals Court Rules, Other Suits At Risk

 
• By 

Decision in AstraZeneca’s lawsuit against the Health and Human Services Department is a precedent-setting victory for the government and a blow to manufacturer efforts to block the price negotiation program.

UK Health Data Research Service Looks ‘Encouraging’ For Industry, But Implementation Details Will Be Key

 

Marcus Vass and Vladimir Murovec of international law firm Osborne Clarke tell the Pink Sheet what the government's planned HDRS might mean for industry, and how it compares with the European Health Data Space.

EU Wants Industry To Define ‘Trade Secrets’ Under Health Data Sharing Regulation

 

The European Health Data Space Regulation is deliberately “vague” when it comes to defining trade secrets because the EU wants the pharma industry to make recommendations on safeguarding intellectual property, a policy officer for the European Commission says.

More from Pink Sheet

Few Takers For EMA’s OPEN Pathway Prompts Rethink

 
• By 

While drug companies say they support the European Medicines Agency’s expanded OPEN framework for the collaborative assessment of marketing applications with non-EU authorities, they are reluctant to participate in the initiative for a number of reasons.

EU Council Could Adopt Pharma Reform Package Next Week, But Disputes Risk A Year’s Delay

 

The Council of the EU wants to adopt its negotiating position on the reform of the general pharmaceutical legislation “sooner, rather than later,” but divergence between member states could push negotiations back another year, a European Commission policy officer said today.

EU HTA Regulation: How Rare Disease Drug Makers Can Meet Worrisome JCAs Data Requirements

 

In an interview with the Pink Sheet, Fonadazione Telethon’s Stefano Benvenuti discusses how companies developing and marketing rare disease treatments can overcome the challenges presented by EU-joint clinical assessment evidence requirements.