Product Liability: Discussions With FDA Remain Key In Defeating State Tort Suits

US Supreme Court says judges, not juries, should decide if FDA would have rejected additional label warning; Merck appears to have the support of three justices who note FDA's position that it decided not to require a change to Fosamax labeling.

US Supreme Court building with 2nd statue on right

The US Supreme Court unanimously ruled that it is up to judges rather than juries to decide whether FDA rejected a drug manufacturer's request to add a warning to its labeling. The court also held that a company must provide "clear evidence" that it fully informed FDA of the reasons for the proposed label change and that the agency told the company it would not approve the change.

In its 20 May ruling in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Albrecht, the court remanded the question of...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal & IP

EU Pharma Reform: Council Proposal A ‘Step In The Right Direction’ But ‘More Work To Be Done’

 

Experts from EUCOPE explain why the Council of the EU’s position on the proposed overhaul of the general pharmaceutical legislation could offer more predictability for companies than the commission’s initial offering.

Aurobindo, MSN Fail To Beat US Nuplazid Patent Expiring In August 2038

 
• By 

Acadia’s Nuplazid for hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson’s disease psychosis appears safe from generic competition until well into the next decade, following a favorable infringement and validity decision by a US district court.

How Pharma Companies Can Mitigate The Impact Of US Tariffs On The Supply Chain

 
• By 

If US tariffs on pharmaceutical supply chain products come into force they could be disruptive for companies. Ewan Townsend, of the international law firm Arnold & Porter, explains how companies can mitigate issues through negotiating with suppliers and reallocating tariff responsibilities.

US FDA’s ‘Good Reputation’ For Science May Mean Loper Bright Not ‘Cataclysmic,’ Attorney Says

 

Bridget Dooling, a law school professor who reviewed draft regulations from the FDA and other agencies as an OMB attorney, said prior federal court decisions suggest judges typically defer to agency decisions based in science.

More from Pink Sheet

Semaglutide: EMA Safety Probe Confirms Rare Eye Disorder Risk

 

The EU product information for Novo Nordisk’s semaglutide medicines is to be updated to include non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy as a side effect with a frequency of “very rare.”

Infographic: Leqembi – A Geographical Comparison

 

The Pink Sheet explores how regulatory approvals for Leqembi differ around the world, and looks at what is coming next.

EU Pharma Reform: Council Proposal A ‘Step In The Right Direction’ But ‘More Work To Be Done’

 

Experts from EUCOPE explain why the Council of the EU’s position on the proposed overhaul of the general pharmaceutical legislation could offer more predictability for companies than the commission’s initial offering.