When the US Food and Drug Administration first put out draft guidance in 2015 on the nonproprietary naming of biological products, a slew of prescriber and patient groups felt that the four-letter suffixes that would be attached to the nonproprietary names should be meaningful rather than arbitrary.
But it appears that at least some of these organizations have warmed up to the naming convention to a certain extent.
Read the full article – start your free trial today!
Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights
- Start your 7-day free trial
- Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
- Access comprehensive global coverage
- Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Already a subscriber?