The Senate user fee reauthorization bill would enable sponsors to get a therapeutic equivalence rating for products approved under the 505(b)(2) pathway rather than go through the onerous process of filing a citizen petition.
Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations Would Be Required For 505(b)(2) Drugs Under Senate User Fee Bill
The Senate HELP Committee added a therapeutic equivalence provision to the draft measure it floated two weeks ago. The bill introduced in the Senate still does not include provisions on clinical trial diversity or 180-day exclusivity.

More from User Fees
Mass FDA layoffs on 1 April were designed to spare product reviewers, but still touched many who are critical to the application review process or drug development, which could mean fewer treatments are brought to the US market first.
Sanofi’s Dupixent, Amgen’s Uplizna, and Bristol’s Opdivo seek new indications, while J&J hopes to start a franchise with nipocalimab and Stealth’s day of reckoning approaches.
FDA staffing cuts are making negotiation preparations more difficult, but also could mean the result is a smaller user fee renewal package.
Republican congressional staffers could bring a wealth of experience and strong contacts with key legislators to the FDA ahead of the next user fee reauthorization process. But will Health and Human Services Department leadership interfere?
More from Pathways & Standards
Novartis is planning to file EU and US marketing applications for an intrathecal formulation of its spinal muscular atrophy gene therapy, Zolgensma, in H1 2025.
The FDA’s accelerated approval draft guidance has left stakeholders seeking clarification of the process for determining a surrogate marker or intermediate clinical endpoint is reasonably likely to confirm clinical benefit.
A risk-based approach to human cell therapies and tissue-based products could incentivize development and prevent bad actors from taking advantage of the current FDA system.