US FDA Begins Implementing New User Fee Programs, But What About The Actual Fees?

Sponsors looking to file applications continue to wait for the new user fees to be announced, as details of the Split Real-Time Application Review (STAR) program, generic drug facility inspection readiness requirement and other changes are revealed.

waiting room
Sponsors continue to wait for the FDA to announce the FY 2023 user fees. • Source: Shutterstock

US Food and Drug Administration officials are releasing guidances and announcements describing new user fee-related activities now that the programs have been reauthorized by Congress.

However, likely the biggest user fee questions remain unanswered, including what the new fees will cost and what sponsors with...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from User Fees

US FDA Upheaval Forces User Fee Talks To Begin Later Than Usual

 

The fall start of PDUFA and GDUFA negotiations could impact the agreement review process and other parts of the schedule intended to ensure it reaches Congress on time.

Generic Drug Industry Seeks More US FDA Communication Reforms In GDUFA Renewal

 
• By 

Enhancing the consistency and clarity of information requests and discipline review letters, and improving assessment milestone communications are key areas targeted by generic drug makers for user fee program negotiations.

US FDA Skips User Fee Increase For More Staff Amid Exodus, Hiring Difficulties

 

A calculation used to determine whether the FDA has the staff to handle its workload also was not included in the description of prescription drug user fee calculations.

August Brings Fresh Faces And Tough Calls To US FDA User Fee Calendar

 

The FDA could act on 17 applications, including 10 novel agents, during August. Only one would be a second-cycle review.

More from Pathways & Standards

Navigating Rare Disease Submissions: Minoryx Stresses Early EMA Engagement

 
• By 

Minoryx explained to Pink Sheet why it believes its resubmission for leriglitazone stands a stronger chance of approval, and highlighted the value of early dialogue with the regulators when it comes to rare diseases, where the understanding of the natural history and outcomes is often limited.

Oncology: Plan Ahead To Rule Out Harm When Survival Not The Endpoint, US FDA Says

 

The FDA recommended sponsors plan ahead for potential issues if overall survival is not feasible as a primary or secondary efficacy endpoint in clinical trials and must be analyzed as a safety outcome.

Selective Safety Data Collection In Clinical Trials: Adoption Lags Despite Benefits, US FDA Says

 
• By 

Lack of awareness is limiting use of guidelines that simplify safety reporting for some late-stage trials, FDA says, while also highlighting wins. Boehringer experienced mixed results, while Novartis, Lilly, and Merck were more successful, and Roche should have probably tried, white paper suggests.