What Will FDA Do If Supreme Court Curtails Chevron Deference?

Lawyers say agency will have to bolster its administrative record as judges tackle complex policy and scientific issues previously left to FDA. Some cases, such as challenges to exclusivity decisions, may be reopened.

FDA lawsuit
Supreme Court case could curtail FDA advantage in litigation • Source: Shutterstock

The US Food and Drug Administrative may have a harder time winning lawsuits challenging its interpretation of statutes it administers if the US Supreme Court eliminates the Chevron deference it has been afforded for nearly 40 years. And the agency will have to be more assiduous in laying the foundation for such legal battles, lawyers say.

If the Supreme Court upsets this doctrine you could expect that “the agency’s administrative record is going to be much, much more robust in terms of justifying its positions,” Freddy Jimenez, senior vice president and general counsel of Celldex Therapeutics, Inc

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal & IP

More from Pink Sheet

Inclusive By Design: UK Pilots Diversity Plans For Drug & Device Trials

 
• By 

The UK has issued clearer guidance to help drug and medical device sponsors demonstrate how they intend to include a diverse and relevant range of participants in their clinical trials.

UK’s International Recognition Procedure: EU Dossier Faster Than US Or Canada

 

Companies that use the European Medicines Agency as a reference regulator for the UK’s International Recognition Procedure can expect a faster approval than those that use other national regulators, such as those in the US and Canada, an MHRA spokesperson has said.

FDA Use Of Artificial Intelligence Will Help US Retain Biotech Leadership

 

At a House subcommittee hearing, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. rebutted lawmaker concerns that NIH cuts will drive research and scientists to other countries and said he does not want to advise parents on vaccinating children for measles, chickenpox or polio.