US FDA’s Anti-Misinformation Campaigns Look Safer After Supreme Court Oral Arguments

FDA’s efforts to tackle misinformation may face fewer legal obstacles moving forward, following oral arguments at the Supreme Court on a case that could have broad ramifications for how the government communicates public health information.

outside of the US Supreme Court building
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on 18 March in a case stemming from government actions on COVID-19 misinformation. • Source: Shutterstock (Erik Cox Photography)

The US Food and Drug Administration’s ability to communicate with social media companies like Facebook about inaccurate scientific and medical information is likely on safer grounds following oral arguments at the Supreme Court on 18 March.

More from Legal & IP

Mifepristone Filing Supports 2023 US FDA Actions, But Experts Caution Against Overanalyzing

 

Filing in the Whole Women’s Health mifepristone case defends the FDA’s 2023 decision on the abortion pill safety program, but experts warn it does not necessarily signal the Trump Administration position in other mifepristone cases attempting to restrict medication abortion access.

Supreme Court May Be Next After Federal Circuit Refuses To Rehear Teva Inhaler Patents Case

 

Teva was forced to delist its ProAir HFA inhaler patents from the FDA’s Orange Book by mid-March after the Federal Circuit denied its petition for en banc rehearing. Will the Supreme Court listen?

HHS Wants 340B Rebate Debate Out Of Courts, Returned To Government

 
• By 

An HHS legal brief argues company lawsuits seeking immediate clearance to use rebates in 340B are premature and that the department has merely used a ‘measured approach’ in weighing the possibility. Past experience suggests otherwise, a pricing expert said.

Kennedy’s Pullback of Public Comment Policy Make May Rules Vulnerable to Lawsuits

 

The Health and Human Services Department's decision to eliminate the Richardson Waiver may be a blow for transparency, but will not completely eliminate scrutiny of regulations, experts said.

More from Pink Sheet

Trump’s Tariffs Will Lead To ‘Instability’ And ‘Less Investment’ In UK

 

While the pharma industry appears to be exempt from US tariffs imposed by President Trump, a member of the UK House of Lords says the details are unknown and warned that uncertainty “leads to less investment” in business as a whole.

Industry Benefits As EU CTIS Hits Global Data Sharing Milestone

 

The EU Clinical Trials Information System has achieved primary registry designation in the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform in a move that is expected to reduce regulatory burden for companies and help them lower compliance costs by aligning with publication requirements in medical journals.

UK Health Secretary Admits VPAG ‘More Expensive’ Than Expected & Needs To Be ‘Resolved’

 

The UK government has listened to industry concerns about high clawback rates under the voluntary scheme and will review it in June in a bid to resolve the issue and “move on to bigger and more important things,” health secretary Wes Streeting says.