The US Food and Drug Administration is concerned about the “prohibitive costs” of the high-performance computers required to review drug applications with artificial intelligence as it sees “a real uptick” in the number of investigational new drug applications and more advanced development programs making use of the technology.
Cost Of Reviewing Drugs With AI Is ‘Prohibitive’ For US FDA
A public-private partnership or other solution may be needed for the FDA to handle the costs of reviewing the growing number of drug applications with AI and machine learning components, CDER Director Patrizia Cavazzoni said.
More from AI
• By
The European Medicines Agency’s qualification of the AIM-NASH tool is said to signify a major advancement for clinical trials for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis. The market size for MASH treatments is expected to grow substantially in the coming years.
• By
US FDA Commissioner nominee Martin Makary is being embraced by industry, and Senate Democrats, as a more traditional pick than other Trump Administration nominees, but the Make America Healthy Again agenda still is clearly coming to the agency.
• By
The exact number of layoffs at the FDA as part of the Trump Administration’s pledge to shrink the federal government is unclear, but the most came from the agency’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
• By
Pharmaceutical companies in the EU have until August to ensure their staff have an adequate level of artificial intelligence literacy in line with new obligations set by the AI Act this month.
More from Advanced Technologies
• By
US FDA Commissioner nominee Martin Makary is being embraced by industry, and Senate Democrats, as a more traditional pick than other Trump Administration nominees, but the Make America Healthy Again agenda still is clearly coming to the agency.
• By
Not all companies will be able to access joint scientific consultations under the EU Health Technology Assessment Regulation, but success is still possible for those that engage with national agencies early on, says EUCOPE’s Alexander Natz.
• By
Payers and health technology assessment bodies in the Netherlands, Germany and Italy are either unwilling to use real-world data in assessments or cannot due to their existing frameworks, say representatives from Gilead Sciences and Autolus Therapeutics.