A California appellate court ruling on disputed Neutrogena sunscreen claims highlights an important distinction in preemption arguments that may dictate their outcomes, namely whether proposed requirements for manufacturers under state law differ from or add to related federal requirements.
Read the full article – start your free trial today!
Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on HBW Insight for daily insights
- Start your 7-day free trial
- Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
- Access comprehensive global coverage
- Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Already a subscriber?