There's growing conviction that gene arrays are less useful than first imagined for expression studies and diagnostics--and that directly reading protein expression will more likely provide an accurate picture of biological status-health, disease, and pharmaceutical response. Thus, a number of companies have started up to create, on the analogy of gene arrays, protein arrays, to allow the simultaneous and quantitative testing of large numbers of proteins-potentially thousands.But the task is easier said than done. First, there are too few proteins known to allow testing for worthwhile expression patterns; and, second, because of the delicacy and variety of proteins, surface chemistry and other problems have historically made arrays impractical. None of this daunts the start-ups who, opportunistic, are looking to exploit the markets they think they can get to first: clinical diagnostics and pharmaceutical clinical development programs.
by Roger Longman
In the last nine months, while the market has punished public companies of all kinds, a half-dozen private companies in...
Read the full article – start your free trial today!
Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Scrip for daily insights
Deal Snapshot: Hengrui makes its third potential billion-dollar licensing deal of 2025, this time sending rights to Phase III hypertrophic cardiomyopathy drug HRS-1893 to Braveheart.
Zydus's saroglitazar beat both Gilead’s Livdelzi and Ipsen’s Iqirvo on biochemical response in topline results from a Phase IIb/III trial in primary biliary cholangitis, but subtle differences in definitions, data on pruritus or itching and other factors could be key to approval and adoption.
Zydus's saroglitazar beat both Gilead’s Livdelzi and Ipsen’s Iqirvo on biochemical response in topline results from a Phase IIb/III trial in primary biliary cholangitis, but subtle differences in definitions, data on pruritus or itching and other factors could be key to approval and adoption.