Issues Abound Tracking Efficacy And Effectiveness In Clinical Trials

A recent JAMA paper assesses the progress of ClinicalTrials.gov, concluding that concerns continue around the use of best methods for generating evidence and the capacity of the clinical trials enterprise to supply the high quality evidence needed to ensure confidence in guidelines. That these issues hold for interventional trials suggests that other strands of clinical research, notably those focused on comparative effectiveness, face similar if not even greater challenges to be able to provide meaningful real-world evidence.

A recent assessment of characteristics of the clinical trials recorded in the US-based registry ClinicalTrials.gov raises questions about the best methods for generating evidence as well as the capacity of clinical trials to supply sufficient amounts of high quality evidence needed to ensure confidence in guideline recommendations. Now armed with this increased level of data from the registry, the study’s authors conclude that the desire to provide high quality evidence for medical decisions must include consideration of a comprehensive redesign of the clinical trials enterprise. That these issues hold for interventional trials suggests that other strands of clinical research, notably those focused on comparative effectiveness, face similar if not even greater challenges to be able to provide meaningful real-world evidence.

“We now have the ability to comprehensively look at the [clinical trials] system, which has never existed before,” says Robert Califf, MD, director of the Duke Translational Medicine Institute...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Scrip for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Clinical Trials

ASCO: AstraZeneca Changes Management Of Breast Cancer Resistance With SERENA-6

 

AstraZeneca presented data from the SERENA-6 trial that experts said could represent a significant change in how HR+/HER2- breast cancer is treated.

Summit’s Ivonescimab Shows Significance On PFS, But Not Overall Survival

 
• By 

In a study intended to show similar benefit in western patients, PD-1/VEGF-targeting ivonescimab met a progression-free survival endpoint, but missed on OS.

Sanofi Bid For Second COPD Approval Hurt By Mixed Itepekimab Data

 
• By 

One Phase III trial hits but a second study misses by a mile.

In Brief: Neurocrine Details New Data For Schizophrenia Drug Moving To Phase III

 

Neurocrine reports new details of positive Phase II results in schizophrenia and a favorable safety and cardiovascular profile for its first-in-class oral M4 agonist, now moving to Phase III trials.

More from R&D

In Brief: Neurocrine Details New Data For Schizophrenia Drug Moving To Phase III

 

Neurocrine reports new details of positive Phase II results in schizophrenia and a favorable safety and cardiovascular profile for its first-in-class oral M4 agonist, now moving to Phase III trials.

Merck & Co./Daiichi Pull Patritumab Deruxtecan BLA On Disappointing OS

 

Patritumab deruxtecan is the lead antibody drug conjugate in a $22bn deal signed between the two partners, with the decision marking a disappointing setback

Senti’s Computer-Logic Inspired Cell Therapy Shows Early Promise

 

The biotech believes its logic-gated cell therapies can get round the need for ‘clean targets’ which limit CAR-Ts and ADCs.