UK MHRA In The Spotlight As Cumberlege Review Puts Medtech Safety At The Top Of Health Agenda

The findings of the Cumberlege Review into how safety issues for three medical product groups were handled will shape debate on the UK’s new devices legislation, now going through parliament. The MHRA’s devices regulatory activity also comes in for scrutiny.

Patient safety

The Baroness Cumberlege Review of long-standing UK patient safety concerns relating to three groups of medical products, entitled First Do No Harm ̶ The report of the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review, was published on 8 July.

Delayed as a result of COVID-19, the review, commissioned in 2018, recommends how the health care system in England can act faster on reports of harmful side effects from drugs and devices

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from United Kingdom

LSX Europe: Women’s Health Education Is The Key For Unlocking VC Investment

 

Flo Health was the first femtech unicorn to be valued at over $1bn. But the company faced 49 investment rejections before reaching that status, Anna Klepchukova, the company’s chief medical officer, told the LSX World Congress Europe. THENA Capital’s Esther Reynal de St Michel Richardot talked through the firm’s gender-smart investment strategy.

UK Medtech Regulators Must Ensure Certainty So Businesses Can Plan Their Futures

 
• By 

With medtech businesses typically managing investment cycles on a three- to five-year basis, local regulatory processes and forward costs of market entry must offer an attractive environment in which companies can plan for growth, says McDermott Will and Emery’s partner and head of healthcare and life sciences, Sharon Lamb. Broad-scale improvements to NICE’s evaluation offerings would similarly enhance the UK’s value to innovators.

Will NICE’s New Medtech Evaluation Plans Hit the Target for Patients and Industry?

 
• By 

One year after the UK mooted the Rules-Based Pathway to give medtechs clarity on what can be expected from an evaluation, the devices industry says UK healthtech assessment and adoption processes are still failing to meet the needs of innovators and patients.

The Value Of Consumer Wearables Within The Clinic Is Currently Unknown, Says Cardiologist

 

“It’s quite likely [consumer wearable manufacturers] are changing the sensitivity and specificity based on consumer feedback, but not for medical reasons,” said Dipak Kotecha, a University of Birmingham professor of cardiology. Often, self-reported performance evidence from manufacturers is “low quality and biased.”

More from Europe

UK Medtech Regulators Must Ensure Certainty So Businesses Can Plan Their Futures

 
• By 

With medtech businesses typically managing investment cycles on a three- to five-year basis, local regulatory processes and forward costs of market entry must offer an attractive environment in which companies can plan for growth, says McDermott Will and Emery’s partner and head of healthcare and life sciences, Sharon Lamb. Broad-scale improvements to NICE’s evaluation offerings would similarly enhance the UK’s value to innovators.

Faster Device Certification Among Keys To Unlocking Innovation In EU MedTech Sector

 

While MedTech Europe sharpens its focus on what the EU most urgently needs to advance the medtech market in four targeted measures, the European Commission has also unveiled four priorities for 2025.

Will NICE’s New Medtech Evaluation Plans Hit the Target for Patients and Industry?

 
• By 

One year after the UK mooted the Rules-Based Pathway to give medtechs clarity on what can be expected from an evaluation, the devices industry says UK healthtech assessment and adoption processes are still failing to meet the needs of innovators and patients.