FDA Warning Letter Prompts Company To Stop Selling Baby-Monitoring Device

For five years Owlet Baby Care Inc. has said its Smart Sock monitoring product isn’t a medical device. But the US FDA disagreed – and finally put its foot down in a warning letter that told the company to come into compliance or stop selling the sock. So Owlet decided to do both.

Owlet Smart Sock.
The Owlet Smart Sock • Source: Alamy

The Utah-based manufacturer of the Smart Sock baby monitor has stopping selling the product after receiving a warning letter from the US Food and Drug Administration that says the sock is a medical device and should be regulated as one.

The Smart Sock wraps around a baby’s foot and monitors the child’s heart rate, blood oxygen levels and sleep patterns.

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Compliance

Whoops! FDA Says Company Marketed Unauthorized Device. The Company Says The FDA Is Wrong

 

A recent FDA warning letter claims a Boston firm that specializes in wearable technology marketed a blood pressure device without agency approval. The company rejects the assertion and says the agency is out of step with federal law.

Warning Letters – June 2025

The US FDA posted eight device-related warning letters in June, touching on industry sectors from urinalysis test strips to ophthalmic devices.

Remote Regulatory Assessments Become Swiss Army Knife For US FDA’s Oversight Of Facilities

 

“RRAs are valuable oversight tools and under certain circumstances, can assist FDA in its mission to protect public health, oversee regulated industry, and help ensure regulated products comply with FDA requirements,” according to final guidance.

Court Orders US FDA To Return Trial Diversity Action Plan Guidance To Website

 
• By 

HHS and its agencies violated the law by swiftly implementing “sweeping and poorly thought-through directives that ordered the bulk removal of healthcare resources,” including FDA draft guidances on diversity action plans and sex differences in clinical trials, a federal court said.

More from Policy & Regulation

Medicare Tricuspid Regurgitation Coverage Decision Big Win For Abbott

 

Medicare beneficiaries with tricuspid regurgitation will now have access to an innovative treatment from Abbott that offers a minimally invasive alternative to open-heart surgery.

Warning Letters – June 2025

The US FDA posted eight device-related warning letters in June, touching on industry sectors from urinalysis test strips to ophthalmic devices.

Study: FDA’s Breakthrough Path Speeds Access, But Raises Safety Questions

 
• By 

Research recently published in JAMA Internal Medicine found that the FDA met its review timeline goals for the majority of breakthrough devices – but also revealed some apparent shortcomings in safety data supporting the submissions.