Surge In US Enforcement Actions Shows Focus On Diagnostics

An apparent spike in health care enforcement actions by the US Department of Justice has led to hundreds of millions of dollars in penalties and multiple jail sentences throughout the sector. The DOJ has announced at least 20 device-related cases since mid-September.

The northern facade of the Department of Justice building in Washington, DC.
• Source: Shutterstock

Diagnostic firm Genomics Health, a subsidiary of Exact Sciences Corp. , agreed to pay $32.5m to resolve allegations it had filed Medicare claims for some cancer tests. A North Carolina lab owner was sentenced to almost 17 years in prison for billing Medicaid for unnecessary drug tests for Medicaid beneficiaries. And at least 10 practitioners are facing jail time or massive fines for violations of the False Claims Act.

That’s just a sliver of the health care fraud cases announced by the US Department of Justice over the last...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Compliance

More from Policy & Regulation

MHRA’s Tallon Hails PMS Regulation As Start Of UK Device Framework Transformation

 
• By 

16 June marked the first major new regulatory instrument in the UK’s post-Brexit transition to a standalone device regulatory system for Great Britain.

Increasing Safety Concerns Spur Scrutiny of Device Plastics Use

 
• By 

With new regulations limiting the use of plastics popping up worldwide, the medtech industry sees arguments on both sides. Some argue hasty bans of PFAS ("forever chemicals") would harm patients, while others say phthalates should be phased out to protect the public.

With LDT Rule DOA, Could FDA Shift Focus To RUOs?

 

Now that the US FDA has chosen not to appeal a March ruling effectively killing the agency’s efforts to regulate lab-developed tests as medical devices, will the agency adopt a different strategy to flex its regulatory muscle?