FDA Often Looks Outside The Application, Review Documents Show

A look back at the past year of Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly’s Drug Review Profile series illustrates the many ways FDA takes external factors into consideration when reviewing an application – from guiding trials to look for certain class safety signals to finding support for a particular endpoint.

For better or for worse, FDA often looks outside the scope of a particular new drug application for guidance in its regulatory reviews. A look at Pharmaceutical Approvals Monthly’s 2013 series of Drug Review Profiles highlights some of the ways that external factors can affect pending applications.

Though the agency is bound to the dataset in front of it, reviewers take the broader context into account as...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Clinical Trials

HHS Wants Employees (And Public?) To Report Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Discrimination

 
• By 

A survey asks FDA staff to disclose whether DEI policies caused discrimination or resulted in disciplinary action against career employees over the past five years, but uses a web form that the general public also can access.

Bayesian Statistics In EU Clinical Trials: EMA Discusses Balancing Efficiency With Rigor

 

Bayesian statistics could help clinical trial sponsors to include external information in their analyses, but concerns around bias and incorrect conclusions remain, the European Medicines Agency said.

Adaptive Clinical Trials Require ‘Clear And Compelling Justification’

 
• By 

A draft international guideline on using adaptive trial designs says sponsors should provide a clear rationale for using such designs to address the potential ‘tension’ between the confirmatory nature of late-stage trials and the flexibility introduced by mid-trial adaptations.

Denmark Sets New EU Benchmark With 14-Day Clinical Trial Review Timeline

 
• By 

Denmark is shaking up clinical trial timelines with a new process for reviewing applications for early-phase mono-national trials that is twice as fast as the standard timelines in the EU and the UK.

More from R&D

Adaptive Clinical Trials Require ‘Clear And Compelling Justification’

 
• By 

A draft international guideline on using adaptive trial designs says sponsors should provide a clear rationale for using such designs to address the potential ‘tension’ between the confirmatory nature of late-stage trials and the flexibility introduced by mid-trial adaptations.

Denmark Sets New EU Benchmark With 14-Day Clinical Trial Review Timeline

 
• By 

Denmark is shaking up clinical trial timelines with a new process for reviewing applications for early-phase mono-national trials that is twice as fast as the standard timelines in the EU and the UK.

Clinical Trial Diversity Action Plan Guidance Must Return To US FDA Website, Court Says

 
• By 

HHS and its agencies violated the law by swiftly implementing “sweeping and poorly thought-through directives that ordered the bulk removal of healthcare resources,” including FDA draft guidances on diversity action plans and sex differences in clinical trials, a federal court said.