Two Treatments For IPF Edge Closer To Market, Will Come Down To Subtle Differences

InterMune’s pirfenidone and Boehringer Ingelheim’s nintedanib are neck-and-neck in the race to be the first drug interventions in the U.S. for the fatal lung disease. Phase III data from both drugs were presented at the American Thoracic Society meeting and published in the NEJM May 18.

Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis could soon have two new treatments on the market, notable because there are currently no drugs approved in the U.S. for the progressive and deadly lung disease. Now that both drugs have crossed the Phase III clinical trial hurdle with positive data and appear closer to FDA approval, the question has shifted to which of the two drugs – InterMune Inc.’s pirfenidone or Boehringer Ingelheim GMBH’s nintedanib – will become the standard of care for first line treatment.

Some analysts and key opinion leaders think InterMune’s product, which is already approved in Europe and Canada as Esbriet, could have an edge over nintedanib, though the treatment

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Clinical Trials

More from R&D

Unlocking Opportunities: How To Engage With The EMA On Animal Testing Alternatives

 

The European Medicines Agency, like its counterpart in the US, is increasingly focusing on the use of alternatives to animal testing.

EU Pharma Reform: Exclusivity Vouchers Alone Are Insufficient Incentive For Antimicrobials, Industry Says

 

European pharma trade associations EFPIA and EUCOPE outline their respective views on how the EU’s pharma legislation overhaul should tackle antimicrobial resistance, and why transferable exclusivity vouchers alone will not suffice as incentives.

What The EMA Can Teach HTA Bodies About Joint Clinical Assessments

 

EU-level joint clinical assessments conducted under the Health Technology Assessment Regulation need to be more flexible when it comes to evidence requirements, according to experts speaking at a gene and cell therapy conference.