Xarelto and Tafamidis: Another Case of Less is More

A pair of advisory committee reviews at the start of June offered an interesting contrast: a big study with small flaws versus a small study with big flaws. At least at the committee level, the small study fared much better. Is this another vote against mega R&D investments?

FDA convened two very interesting advisory committee reviews during the first week of June. On the surface, the applications look like polar opposites. One was for a new indication for an already marketed anti-clotting drug: Johnson & Johnson/Bayer AG’s Xarelto (rivaroxaban) for use in acute coronary syndrome. The other was for an “ultra-orphan” neurological indication: Pfizer Inc.’s tafamidis for treatment of familial amyloid polyneuropathy.

The differences go beyond the target disease: these two applications present a stark contrast in scale. One statistic captures the...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from US FDA Performance Tracker

More from Regulatory Trackers