Drug Price Hikes, Shortages Follow FDA Crackdown On Unapproved Drugs

Study finds unintended consequences of FDA initiative requiring manufacturers of unapproved drugs to obtain approval or remove them from the market but FDA says study does not consider broad impact of the initiative.

FDA approved background, 3D rendering, blue street sign

FDA's strategy for dealing with drugs marketed before the 1962 law requiring them to be proven efficacious may have led to an increase in drug prices and shortages, according to a study led by Yale University School of Medicine alumnus Ravi Gupta.

The researchers examined products that fell under FDA's 2006 Unapproved Drugs Initiative (UDI), which requires manufacturers of unapproved drugs to either obtain approval or remove them from the market. The agency provided an incentive for companies to voluntarily submit applications for unapproved drugs, saying it could give a shorter grace period to subsequent applicants before taking enforcement action, thereby giving the first company to obtain an approval "a period of de facto market exclusivity" before other products received approval

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from US FDA

Trump Administration Push For Dismissal, Transfer Of Mifepristone Case Leaves Overhang For Pharma

 

The Trump Administration requested a dismissal or transfer of a lawsuit seeking to tighten the safety requirements for the abortion pill mifepristone on procedural grounds, which still leaves the administration's position on the case's merits unclear.

What MAHA Means For US FDA: Prevention Is Not What You Think

 

US HHS Advisor Calley Means said new pathways for root-cause treatments are part of the HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s vision for the FDA. But what most biopharma companies consider preventative medicines are not what he has in mind, nor does he seem to see those companies as part of the solution.

Makary’s Reorganization Decision A Turning Point For US FDA?

 

US FDA Commissioner Martin Makary’s disavowal of a proposed reorganization plan may be an important turning point in the Trump Administration. The move does not improve the situation, but may mean the administration stops actively making things worse.

Pink Sheet Podcast: Vaccine Review Political Interference, Missed Deadlines A Harbinger Of US FDA Problems?

Pink Sheet reporter and editors discuss FDA Commissioner Martin Makary’s decision to have one of his assistants lead negotiations for Novavax’s delayed COVID-19 vaccine review, as well as some recent missed review deadlines, which may be the result of recent FDA cuts.

More from Agency Leadership

How Tumult At US FDA Could Impact Merger and Acquisition Strategy

 

With review and development uncertainly increasing, "it’s going to take longer for certain targets … to progress to a place where they’ve been derisked enough that big pharma is ready to write a big check," said Andrew Goodman of Paul Hastings.

US FDA Not Industry’s ‘Sock Puppet,’ Ultragenyx’s Emil Kakkis Says

 
• By 

The biotech CEO said the Trump Administration’s treatment of FDA employees, including the HHS secretary’s comments about industry capture, are insulting to agency staff, but he is encouraged by FDA Commissioner Martin Makary’s talk of a new conditional approval pathway.

US FDA Commissioner’s Office Plans Involvement In Many Approvals In Potential Major Change

 

FDA Commissioner Martin Makary's remarks that his special assistant Tracy Beth Høeg will "be involved in other approval procedures" besides Novavax's COVID-19 vaccine application could be a dramatic change in operations, potentially making the approval system unpredictable.