US FDA May Prioritize Pediatric Cancer Studies By Level Of 'Substantial Relevance'

Assessing the extent of a molecular target's substantial relevance to pediatric cancer could give sponsors more regulatory certainty as to whether they likely would be required to conduct pediatric investigations early in a drug’s development, US FDA's Gregory Reaman says at advisory committee review of molecular target candidate lists.

FDA Advisory Committee Feature image

The US FDA may prioritize the need for pediatric studies of new cancer drugs based on how substantially relevant a drug’s molecular target is to the development and growth of pediatric cancer, rather than just whether the target is or is not substantially relevant at all.

Speaking at a June 20 meeting of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee’s pediatric subcommittee, Gregory Reaman, associate director for pediatric...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from US FDA Performance Tracker

More from Regulatory Trackers