Regenerative Medicine Therapies: Manufacturing Changes May Not Impact RMAT Designation

Final guidance notes that preliminary clinical evidence may come from studies conducted outside the US, says historical controls may be considered in clinical trial designs.

3D Human or animal Cell

The US FDA made minor tweaks to its draft guidance for development of regenerative medicine therapies, clarifying that historical controls may be considered in clinical trials, that sponsors may receive more than one regenerative medicine advanced therapy (RMAT) designation for a product, and that manufacturing changes to products would not necessarily preclude an initial RMAT designation or cause it to be rescinded.

The agency's final guidance, Expedited Programs for Regenerative Medicine Therapies for Serious Conditions, includes few changes to the draft...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Clinical Trials

Animal Testing: US And EU Regulatory Support Grows For Alternatives, But Validation A Hurdle

 

In this first of a two-part series of articles, US Pharmacopeia CEO Ronald T. Piervincenzi tells the Pink Sheet how the use of alternatives to animal testing in drug development is gaining traction and discusses the challenges that exist.

HHS Wants Employees (And Public?) To Report Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Discrimination

 
• By 

A survey asks FDA staff to disclose whether DEI policies caused discrimination or resulted in disciplinary action against career employees over the past five years, but uses a web form that the general public also can access.

Bayesian Statistics In EU Clinical Trials: EMA Discusses Balancing Efficiency With Rigor

 

Bayesian statistics could help clinical trial sponsors to include external information in their analyses, but concerns around bias and incorrect conclusions remain, the European Medicines Agency said.

Adaptive Clinical Trials Require ‘Clear And Compelling Justification’

 
• By 

A draft international guideline on using adaptive trial designs says sponsors should provide a clear rationale for using such designs to address the potential ‘tension’ between the confirmatory nature of late-stage trials and the flexibility introduced by mid-trial adaptations.

More from R&D

Korea Pre-Review Consultations Help Accelerate R&D

 
• By 

A system of pre-regulatory review consultations for innovative drugs and devices in South Korea has contributed to the accelerated development of such products.

Adaptive Clinical Trials Require ‘Clear And Compelling Justification’

 
• By 

A draft international guideline on using adaptive trial designs says sponsors should provide a clear rationale for using such designs to address the potential ‘tension’ between the confirmatory nature of late-stage trials and the flexibility introduced by mid-trial adaptations.

Denmark Sets New EU Benchmark With 14-Day Clinical Trial Review Timeline

 
• By 

Denmark is shaking up clinical trial timelines with a new process for reviewing applications for early-phase mono-national trials that is twice as fast as the standard timelines in the EU and the UK.