The changes to clinical trial conduct necessitated by the COVID-19 outbreak is providing a “natural experiment” to test different techniques to run de-centralized clinical trials, representatives of the US Food & Drug Administration suggested during a 13-14 July meeting on the evolution of digital health systems in oncology.
COVID-19 Clinical Trial Disruptions: A Real-World Test Of De-Centralized Techniques
US FDA asks oncology drug sponsors for information on the impact of modifications to clinical trials during the pandemic – with close attention to remote monitoring and data collection.
More from Clinical Trials
• By
The EU Clinical Trials Information System has achieved primary registry designation in the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform in a move that is expected to reduce regulatory burden for companies and help them lower compliance costs by aligning with publication requirements in medical journals.
• By
Newly published insights from a series of European Medicines Agency workshops can guide drug developers in designing development plans that meet the needs of both regulators and health technology assessment bodies.
• By
The new global GCP guideline, ICH E6(R3), enables researchers and clinical trial administrators to tailor their documentation processes, but also opens the door for more scrutiny during GCP inspections.
• By
The European Medicines Agency’s qualification of the AIM-NASH tool is said to signify a major advancement for clinical trials for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis. The market size for MASH treatments is expected to grow substantially in the coming years.
More from R&D
• By
The European Medicines Agency’s qualification of the AIM-NASH tool is said to signify a major advancement for clinical trials for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis. The market size for MASH treatments is expected to grow substantially in the coming years.
• By
As Indian CROs are bracing for new registration mandates, an expert panel at the IGBA’s 3rd Bioequivalence conference discusses the implications of non-compliance in bioequivalence studies.
• By
Experts working in the advanced therapy space say the US has less strict criteria for regulatory pathways for cell and gene therapies than the EU, particularly for products in early development.