J&J, Distributors May Be Free Of Opioid Litigation If Enough States Sign On To $26bn Settlement

NY AG has ‘no comment’ on whether criminal charges will be pursued against company executives; NC AG predicts ‘north of 40 states’ expected to accept settlement and would then need to convince municipalities to come on board. States with ongoing litigation against manufacturers may opt for jury trial instead. 

Opioids states
J&J, distributors reach deal with states to resolve opioid litigation • Source: Alamy

Johnson & Johnson will pay up to $5bn over nine years and the three largest US distributors – Cardinal Health, Inc., McKesson Corp., and AmerisourceBergen Corporation – will pay up to $21bn over the next 18 years to resolve claims by state and local governments they helped fuel the opioid epidemic under an agreement with state attorneys general.

But the deal, which would be the second largest in US history after the tobacco industry settlement, depends on a critical mass of states,

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Legal & IP

HHS Secretary Kennedy Says Trump Will Make Final Decision On Mifepristone Policy

 

With an FDA review ongoing, Kennedy’s admission, made during a Senate hearing on the Health and Human Services Department’s budget request, suggests political officials could supersede scientific decisions.

Medicare Negotiation Does Not Violate Due Process, Appeals Court Rules, Other Suits At Risk

 
• By 

Decision in AstraZeneca’s lawsuit against the Health and Human Services Department is a precedent-setting victory for the government and a blow to manufacturer efforts to block the price negotiation program.

UK Health Data Research Service Looks ‘Encouraging’ For Industry, But Implementation Details Will Be Key

 

Marcus Vass and Vladimir Murovec of international law firm Osborne Clarke tell the Pink Sheet what the government's planned HDRS might mean for industry, and how it compares with the European Health Data Space.

EU Wants Industry To Define ‘Trade Secrets’ Under Health Data Sharing Regulation

 

The European Health Data Space Regulation is deliberately “vague” when it comes to defining trade secrets because the EU wants the pharma industry to make recommendations on safeguarding intellectual property, a policy officer for the European Commission says.

More from Pink Sheet

Inclusive By Design: UK Pilots Diversity Plans For Drug & Device Trials

 
• By 

The UK has issued clearer guidance to help drug and medical device sponsors demonstrate how they intend to include a diverse and relevant range of participants in their clinical trials.

UK’s International Recognition Procedure: EU Dossier Faster Than US Or Canada

 

Companies that use the European Medicines Agency as a reference regulator for the UK’s International Recognition Procedure can expect a faster approval than those that use other national regulators, such as those in the US and Canada, an MHRA spokesperson has said.

FDA Use Of Artificial Intelligence Will Help US Retain Biotech Leadership

 

At a House subcommittee hearing, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. rebutted lawmaker concerns that NIH cuts will drive research and scientists to other countries and said he does not want to advise parents on vaccinating children for measles, chickenpox or polio.