It’s The Overall Survival, Sponsors! Ovarian Cancer Indications Withdrawn For Three PARP Inhibitors

PARP inhibitors appear to be getting the same kind of scrutiny that US FDA has given to P13K inhibitors. AstraZeneca’s Lynparza, GSK’s Zejula, and Clovis’ Rubraca have indications voluntarily withdrawn after ‘potential detrimental effect’ on overall survival seen in randomized clinical trials.

Ovarian cancer
Sponsors withdraw certain indications for ovarian cancer drugs based on overall survival data • Source: Shutterstock

The US Food and Drug Administration approved three PARP inhibitors for third- and fourth-line ovarian cancer indications based on the results of single-arm studies showing improvement in objective response rate or progression-free survival. But subsequent randomized trials indicate that they may have a detrimental effect on overall survival, leading the sponsors to withdraw the indications.

The three poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are Clovis Oncology, Inc.’s Rubraca (rucaparib), AstraZeneca PLC’s Lynparza (olaparib), and GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd.’s Zejula (niraparib).

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Clinical Trials

ClinicalTrials.gov Or ISRCTN: Getting Transparency Right For UK Trials

 
• By 

ISRCTN’s systems are being redesigned to facilitate compliance with upcoming requirements in the UK’s clinical trials legislation.

Observational, Retrospective Trials Could Retest Vaccines, HHS’ Kennedy Says

 

The Health and Human Services secretary told a Senate appropriations subcommittee that placebo-controlled trials may not be necessary to ensure vaccine safety as the FDA released a framework requiring them for COVID-19 vaccines.

Commission Taking ‘Due Account’ Of Scathing Report On EU Clinical Trial Bottlenecks

 
• By 

A report by the European pharmaceutical industry criticizes the EU’s clinical trials framework, highlighting regulatory fragmentation, inefficiencies and the need for targeted reforms.

UK MHRA’s Clinical Trial Lead On Combined Reviews, The Notification Scheme & Increasing Diversity

 

In light of the UK’s MHRA announcing a major overhaul of its clinical trial legislation, the agency’s deputy director for clinical investigations and trials Andrea Manfrin tells the Pink Sheet what sponsors can expect from the new regulation.

More from R&D

UK MHRA’s Clinical Trial Lead On Combined Reviews, The Notification Scheme & Increasing Diversity

 

In light of the UK’s MHRA announcing a major overhaul of its clinical trial legislation, the agency’s deputy director for clinical investigations and trials Andrea Manfrin tells the Pink Sheet what sponsors can expect from the new regulation.

US FDA COVID-19 Booster Strategy May Not Be As Controversial As It Seems

 

US FDA Commissioner Martin Makary’s call for placebo-controlled trials to confirm the efficacy of COVID-19 boosters is drawing a lot of criticism, but former Commissioner Robert Califf also supported the idea.

EU Shaping Biotech Act To Unleash SME Potential

 

European companies, in particular small and midsize enterprises, spin-offs and start-ups have a hard time expanding within the single market “because of a complex regulatory framework that is perceived as slow and burdensome,” according to the European Commission.