A lack of specificity in the US Food and Drug Administration’s genome editing draft guidance allowed Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated to set what an advisory committee deemed a sufficiently high bar in its analyses for potential off-target effects with the sickle cell disease gene therapy exagamglogene autotemcel (exa-cel).
Although the FDA’s guidance describes the types of nonclinical studies that are appropriate for analyzing potential off-target edits, it does not quantify the number of donor samples that should be tested in such studies or how a sponsor should
Key Takeaways
-
FDA guidance on genome editing products does not specify the number of donor samples that should be used in nonclinical analyses of off-target editing.
-
Vertex reported that no off-target editing was observed across three off-target assessments performed in CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells from a total of 14 healthy donors and patients
Read the full article – start your free trial today!
Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights
- Start your 7-day free trial
- Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
- Access comprehensive global coverage
- Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Already a subscriber?