1. Pink Sheet
  2. >>Regulatory Trackers
  3. >>US FDA Performance Tracker

‘Pipeline In A Pill’ Or Pipe Dream? US FDA’s April Goal Dates Test Expansion Strategies

 
• By Bridget Silverman

Sanofi’s Dupixent, Amgen’s Uplizna, and Bristol’s Opdivo seek new indications, while J&J hopes to start a franchise with nipocalimab and Stealth’s day of reckoning approaches.

Sponsors are hoping approvals will blossom along with the cherry trees. (Shutterstock)

“Pipeline in a pill”-style drug development will be on display in April, when more than half of the user fee goal dates are for new indications on sometimes sprawling labels, as well as one novel biologic, nipocalimab, that Johnson & Johnson sees as the foundation of its own anti-FcRn franchise in autoimmune disease.

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Pink Sheet for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from US FDA Performance Tracker

More from Pathways & Standards

US FDA Shows Support For Generic Drug User Fee Goals Amid Cutbacks

 
• By Michael McCaughan

The FDA struck an upbeat tone during its annual Generic Drugs Forum despite an unprecedented period of cutbacks and disruptions and reiterated a desire to continue meeting user fee goals.

US FDA’s Makary Floats Vague ‘Plausible Mechanism’ Approval Pathway For Rare Diseases

 
• By Sarah Karlin-Smith

Ascertaining the novelty and benefits of Makary’s new drug approval idea – along with what it would take to implement it – requires more clarity on the types of studies he envisions being used to grant and confirm “plausible mechanism’ approvals.

Confirmatory Trials: Industry Wants Timely Protocol Feedback, More Clarity On ‘Due Diligence’

 
• By Sue Sutter

Consumer and academic group comments on accelerated approval and confirmatory trial guidances say the proposed criteria for determining when a study is underway are too vague.