Pharmacogenomic Data and Labeling: A Less-Safe Harbor for Existing Drugs?

At the same time that FDA is taking pains to assure companies that pharmacogenomics data won't affect the review process for new drugs unless the agency and the sponsor first agree on the meaning of those data, it's also thinking of taking a tougher position with existing drugs.

At the same time that the FDA is taking pains to assure companies that pharmacogenomics data won't affect the review process for new drugs unless the agency and the sponsor first agree on the meaning of those data, it's thinking of taking a tougher position with existing drugs. The FDA is in the midst of considering the appropriate standards for reviewing labels of existing drugs to see if they should now include pharmacogenomics data that would better inform physician prescribing decisions. And the agency appears to be contemplating a threshold for review that is lower than the level of adverse event reporting that would trigger a review for the purposes of recalling a compound.

For some time, FDA officials have been ratcheting up efforts to work with industry to determine the appropriate uses for pharmacogenomic information in clinical decision making. The pace of the...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on In Vivo for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Archive

Final Chance To Have Your Say: Take Our Reader Survey This Week

 

Editor’s note: This is your final call to participate in the survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. The deadline is 20 September.

Early Development Deals: Ipsen's Strategy For Biomarker-Driven Success

 

Mary Jane Hinrichs, Ipsen’s head of early development, talks to In Vivo about getting ahead of the competition by securing deals for candidates before they enter Phase I trials.   

Shape Our Content: Take The Reader Survey

 

Editor’s note: We are conducting a survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. If there are any changes you’d like to see in the coverage topics, content format or the method in which you receive and access In Vivo, or if you love it how it is, now is the time to have your voice heard.

In Partnership with Cerba Research

Prioritizing Safety in CAR-T Therapy: Patient Monitoring with Cerba Research’s Testing Portfolio

The cell and gene therapy (CGT) clinical trial landscape in general and CAR-T cell clinical trials in particular are a special focus for the FDA, EMA, and other regulatory agencies. The whole industry is thus aware of the recent FDA safety investigation and requirements for labeling CAR therapy products.

More from In Vivo

The 360 Degrees Of European Biotech Financing In 2025

 
• By 

Almost halfway through 2025, and financing for European biotech could be described as challenging. Market volatility, geopolitical instability and trade barriers all loom large in biotech CEO minds when pitching for funding. In Vivo talked to biotechs and investors to gain a realistic view of the current market for company funding so far this year.

Rising Leaders 2025: Pedro Valencia’s ADC Vision At AbbVie

 
• By 

From chemical engineering to cancer innovation, AbbVie's rising oncology leader is advancing next-generation ADCs to tackle difficult-to-treat tumors with a patient-centered approach.

Leaders At The Frontier: Conversations From SynBioBeta 2025

 
• By 

Mini-profiles of five synthetic biology companies and their leaders from SynBioBeta 2025 reveal how AI integration, data-driven platforms and interdisciplinary teams are revolutionizing drug discovery and manufacturing.