1. In Vivo
  2. >>Archive

Pharmacogenomic Data and Labeling: A Less-Safe Harbor for Existing Drugs?

At the same time that FDA is taking pains to assure companies that pharmacogenomics data won't affect the review process for new drugs unless the agency and the sponsor first agree on the meaning of those data, it's also thinking of taking a tougher position with existing drugs.

At the same time that the FDA is taking pains to assure companies that pharmacogenomics data won't affect the review process for new drugs unless the agency and the sponsor first agree on the meaning of those data, it's thinking of taking a tougher position with existing drugs. The FDA is in the midst of considering the appropriate standards for reviewing labels of existing drugs to see if they should now include pharmacogenomics data that would better inform physician prescribing decisions. And the agency appears to be contemplating a threshold for review that is lower than the level of adverse event reporting that would trigger a review for the purposes of recalling a compound.

For some time, FDA officials have been ratcheting up efforts to work with industry to determine the appropriate uses for...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on In Vivo for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Archive

Final Chance To Have Your Say: Take Our Reader Survey This Week

 
• By Eleanor Malone

Editor’s note: This is your final call to participate in the survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. The deadline is 20 September.

Early Development Deals: Ipsen's Strategy For Biomarker-Driven Success

 
• By Eliza Slawther

Mary Jane Hinrichs, Ipsen’s head of early development, talks to In Vivo about getting ahead of the competition by securing deals for candidates before they enter Phase I trials.   

Shape Our Content: Take The Reader Survey

 
• By Eleanor Malone

Editor’s note: We are conducting a survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. If there are any changes you’d like to see in the coverage topics, content format or the method in which you receive and access In Vivo, or if you love it how it is, now is the time to have your voice heard.

In Partnership with Cerba Research

Prioritizing Safety in CAR-T Therapy: Patient Monitoring with Cerba Research’s Testing Portfolio

The cell and gene therapy (CGT) clinical trial landscape in general and CAR-T cell clinical trials in particular are a special focus for the FDA, EMA, and other regulatory agencies. The whole industry is thus aware of the recent FDA safety investigation and requirements for labeling CAR therapy products.

More from In Vivo

Deals Shaping The Industry, May 2025

 
• By In Vivo Team

An interactive look at pharma, medtech and diagnostics deals made during May 2025. Data courtesy of Biomedtracker.

Podcast: Flagship’s Vision To Predict And Prevent Illness, With Raj Panjabi

 
• By David Wild

Flagship Pioneering senior partner Raj Panjabi discusses shifting health care from reactive treatment to AI-powered prediction and prevention of disease before symptoms emerge.

Rising Leaders 2025: Namrata Saroj On The Importance Of Authenticity In Ophthalmology

 
• By Sushmita Panda

Namrata Saroj, chief business officer of Ocular Therapeutix, is highly respected in the retina community for her contributions to drug development. She talked to In Vivo about her journey in ophthalmology, leadership philosophy and the importance of authenticity in a close-knit specialty.